2016
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.03.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cancer Recurrence Following Immune-Suppressive Therapies in Patients With Immune-Mediated Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract: Background & Aims Physicians frequently encounter patients with immune-mediated diseases and a history of malignancy. There are limited data on the safety of immunosuppressive therapy for these patients. Published studies have been small with few events, precluding robust estimates of risk. Methods We searched Medline, EMBASE, and conference proceedings for terms related to immune mediated disease, immune-suppressive therapy, and cancer recurrence from inception to April 2015. We included 16 studies (9 of pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
75
1
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
3
75
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In theory, this balance may be altered by immunosuppression and IS should be avoided for life. Of note however, the meta-analysis by Shelton et al [18] did not show an increased rate of recurrent cancer associated with IS in the group of patients who had had cancer more than 6 years ago, while in this particular population, the risk of bias was probably lower than in patients with a shorter interval from the diagnosis of cancer.…”
Section: Safe Interval For Starting Is After Successful Treatment Of mentioning
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In theory, this balance may be altered by immunosuppression and IS should be avoided for life. Of note however, the meta-analysis by Shelton et al [18] did not show an increased rate of recurrent cancer associated with IS in the group of patients who had had cancer more than 6 years ago, while in this particular population, the risk of bias was probably lower than in patients with a shorter interval from the diagnosis of cancer.…”
Section: Safe Interval For Starting Is After Successful Treatment Of mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The incidence rate of cancer was 84.5 per 1,000 patient-years [22] . In the metaanalysis of Shelton et al [18] , rates of cancer recurrence were not different among IBD patients treated with an anti-TNF agent (pooled incidence rate 48 per 1,000 patient-years) and IBD controls (pooled incidence rate 36 per 1,000 patient-years). However, pooling data from rheumatology and IBD studies showed a higher, albeit not significant, incidence of cancer recurrence in patients receiving combotherapy (pooled incidence rate 54 per 1,000 patient-years).…”
Section: Anti-tnf Agentsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, monotherapy with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α antagonists or methotrexate is known to increase the risk for melanomatous and non-melanomatous skin cancers, but its risk for hematological disorders, such as MDS and lymphoproliferative diseases, is not clear [18]. Moreover, a recent metaanalysis on patients who were given immunosuppressive therapy for immuno-mediated diseases after a prior malignancy showed that the incidence rates of new primary cancer (i.e., skin cancer, melanoma, hematological malignancy, breast and solid cancers) were not significantly different among patients who did not receive immunosuppression, those who receive anti-TNF-α antagonists and those who received conventional immunosuppression with thiopurines and methotrexate [19]. [20,21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%