2009
DOI: 10.1080/02841860902862503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cancer patients without a known primary: Incidence and survival trends in Sweden 1960–2007

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

4
55
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
55
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our CUP cohort is smaller than those of large, European-based population studies of CUP with sample sizes ranging from 18 911 to 57 638 [9,11,14]. however, our work encompassed a six-year period, whereas these studies included 21 [9] to 47 [11] years of observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our CUP cohort is smaller than those of large, European-based population studies of CUP with sample sizes ranging from 18 911 to 57 638 [9,11,14]. however, our work encompassed a six-year period, whereas these studies included 21 [9] to 47 [11] years of observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Our CUP cohort is smaller than those of large, European-based population studies of CUP with sample sizes ranging from 18 911 to 57 638 [9,11,14]. however, our work encompassed a six-year period, whereas these studies included 21 [9] to 47 [11] years of observations. as a consequence, our study did not include CUP cases from the 1990s, a period that is suggested to have been the peak of CUP incidence from European cancer registries [11,14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to studies in Europe, 2,5,6) CUP accounts for 3% to 5% of all cancers, although the reported incidence of CUP extends to a wide range because of the difficulty in defining CUP. A study analyzing 26641 CUP patients demonstrated that 9633 patients (36.2%), in total, were diagnosed with lymph node metastasis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the exact etiology of CUP is poorly understood, CUP is thought to either represent: (i) a concurrent but undetected primary cancer, or (ii) a spontaneously regressed primary cancer that was either misdiagnosed, ignored, or went unnoticed. The incidence of CUP has declined, mainly due to the evolution of new detection methods and diagnostic modalities to identify the primary site [5,6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%