Abstract:BackgroundCancer patients contribute significantly to emergency department (ED) utilization. The objective of this study was to identify factors associated with patients becoming ED frequent attenders (FA) after a cancer‐related hospitalization.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted using national administrative, billing, and death records of Singapore residents discharged alive from Singapore public hospitals from January 2012 to December 2015, with a primary discharge diagnosis of cancer. Patients… Show more
“…Patients receiving less housing subsidies (3‐3.9 [OR, 0.34; 0.16‐0.71] and ≥4 [OR, 0.37; 0.19‐0.73]) were less likely to be an FA (Table ). These findings were similar to our previous study …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…In this study, we found that these factors associated with an increased risk of FA status: lower SES (housing subsidy type) and greater comorbidity. This was similar to the findings from other studies …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Studies have shown FAs to have a higher chronic disease burden, lower SES, and higher utilization of nonemergency health care services . In a previous national cohort study, we found that certain cancer profiles increased the risk of ED FA: head and neck cancers were up to twice as likely to be an FA …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…A single‐center retrospective cohort study was conducted using National Cancer Centre head and neck cancer registry data (matched with Singapore death registry data), linked with administrative data of ED visits and inpatient admissions. Our data are from a single‐institution prospectively collected head and neck cancer registry, covering more than 50% representation of the patients nationally, linked to the national death registry, which has 100% coverage of the entire country …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have evaluated the risk factors for increased health care utilization . The commonest ED complaints of patients with cancer appear to be similar to that of the general population but may also present with unique cancer‐related issues, either from the cancer itself or from complications of treatment or side effects .…”
Background
Patients with head and neck cancer have a higher risk of emergency department (ED) frequent attender (FA). We hypothesized that FAs present with issues different from non‐FAs.
Methods
A retrospective cohort study was conducted on Singapore residents with head and neck cancers using de‐identified registry merged with electronic medical record data. A competing risk regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with FA. Aggregated primary diagnoses were compared for patients with and without FA risk factors.
Results
Thirteen percent of patients with head and neck cancer were FAs. FA risk factors were Charlson comorbidity index (3+), and socioeconomic status (SES). FAs had a higher proportion of respiratory infections. The spectrum of diagnosis was similar for patients with low and high SES. Current smokers had a greater proportion of respiratory complaints, relative to never smokers.
Conclusion
Patients with greater comorbidity scores or higher SES were more likely to be FA. FAs were more likely to present with respiratory complaints, likely related to cancer treatment, or smoking status.
“…Patients receiving less housing subsidies (3‐3.9 [OR, 0.34; 0.16‐0.71] and ≥4 [OR, 0.37; 0.19‐0.73]) were less likely to be an FA (Table ). These findings were similar to our previous study …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…In this study, we found that these factors associated with an increased risk of FA status: lower SES (housing subsidy type) and greater comorbidity. This was similar to the findings from other studies …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Studies have shown FAs to have a higher chronic disease burden, lower SES, and higher utilization of nonemergency health care services . In a previous national cohort study, we found that certain cancer profiles increased the risk of ED FA: head and neck cancers were up to twice as likely to be an FA …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…A single‐center retrospective cohort study was conducted using National Cancer Centre head and neck cancer registry data (matched with Singapore death registry data), linked with administrative data of ED visits and inpatient admissions. Our data are from a single‐institution prospectively collected head and neck cancer registry, covering more than 50% representation of the patients nationally, linked to the national death registry, which has 100% coverage of the entire country …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have evaluated the risk factors for increased health care utilization . The commonest ED complaints of patients with cancer appear to be similar to that of the general population but may also present with unique cancer‐related issues, either from the cancer itself or from complications of treatment or side effects .…”
Background
Patients with head and neck cancer have a higher risk of emergency department (ED) frequent attender (FA). We hypothesized that FAs present with issues different from non‐FAs.
Methods
A retrospective cohort study was conducted on Singapore residents with head and neck cancers using de‐identified registry merged with electronic medical record data. A competing risk regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with FA. Aggregated primary diagnoses were compared for patients with and without FA risk factors.
Results
Thirteen percent of patients with head and neck cancer were FAs. FA risk factors were Charlson comorbidity index (3+), and socioeconomic status (SES). FAs had a higher proportion of respiratory infections. The spectrum of diagnosis was similar for patients with low and high SES. Current smokers had a greater proportion of respiratory complaints, relative to never smokers.
Conclusion
Patients with greater comorbidity scores or higher SES were more likely to be FA. FAs were more likely to present with respiratory complaints, likely related to cancer treatment, or smoking status.
BackgroundPatients with metastatic cancer experience high healthcare use and costs, most of which are unplanned. We aimed to assess whether patients with more competent informal caregivers have lower unplanned healthcare use and costs.MethodsThis study used data from a prospective cohort of patients with solid metastatic cancer. Patients and their informal family caregivers were surveyed every 3 months until patients' death. Patients' unplanned healthcare use/costs were examined through hospital records. Caregivers responded to the 4‐item Caregiver Competence Scale. First, in a deceased subsample of patients and their caregivers, we used patients' last 2 years of data (226 dyads) to assess the association between caregivers' competency (independent variable) and patients' unplanned healthcare use/costs (outcomes). Next, in a prospective sample of patient‐caregiver dyads (up to 15 surveys), we assessed whether patients' functional well‐being and psychological distress moderated the association between caregivers' competency and unplanned healthcare use/costs (311 dyads).ResultsIn the deceased subsample, during last 2 years of patients' life, caregivers' higher competency lowered the odds of patients' unplanned healthcare use [OR (CI) = 0.86 (0.75, 0.98), p = 0.03], and was associated with a significant reduction in unplanned healthcare costs [Coeff (CI) = −0.19 (−0.36, −0.01), p = 0.03]. In the prospective sample, patients' functional well‐being and psychological distress moderated the association between caregivers' competency and patients' unplanned healthcare use/costs.ConclusionWith deterioration in patients' condition and an increase in caregiving demands, improving caregivers' competency can reduce patients' unplanned healthcare use and costs. This should be further tested in future trials.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.