2015
DOI: 10.1111/ajr.12169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cancer outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians in rural and remote areas

Abstract: More research is needed to fully understand geographic differentials in cancer outcomes within the Indigenous population. Knowing how geographical location interacts with Indigenous status can help to identify ways of improving cancer outcomes for Indigenous Australians.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The factors contributing to poorer cancer outcomes are not yet clear, but could be related to both geographic location with the associated lack of accessible/local services and cultural factors. 26 Rural EOL residents were reported as having higher rates of life-limiting congestive heart failure, cancer, renal failure and emphysema than urban EOL residents. 27 Rural EOL patients were poorly managed in terms of pain and other symptoms and less likely to receive intravenous medications treatment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The factors contributing to poorer cancer outcomes are not yet clear, but could be related to both geographic location with the associated lack of accessible/local services and cultural factors. 26 Rural EOL residents were reported as having higher rates of life-limiting congestive heart failure, cancer, renal failure and emphysema than urban EOL residents. 27 Rural EOL patients were poorly managed in terms of pain and other symptoms and less likely to receive intravenous medications treatment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Indigenous cancer patients were less likely to be diagnosed and to receive cancer treatment compared with their urban counterparts. The factors contributing to poorer cancer outcomes are not yet clear, but could be related to both geographic location with the associated lack of accessible/local services and cultural factors . Rural EOL residents were reported as having higher rates of life‐limiting congestive heart failure, cancer, renal failure and emphysema than urban EOL residents .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Those from remote areas have even higher mortality and lower survival compared to metropolitan areas. 8 In that study, Indigenous patients from remote backgrounds had greater delays in diagnosis, more advanced stage at presentation and less treatment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Rural patients with cancer have lower access and usage of health care services due to the distances from health services 6 as well as fewer social and community support groups 1 . The level of care and support that cancer patients receive during the transition to survivorship is critical.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rural patients may be at higher risk of poor physical health outcomes, which can lead to mental health problems 9 such as higher levels of distress, anxiety and depression 2 . The Australian Journal of Cancer Nursing research and there has been limited research about their care, emotional and psychological health, and wellbeing 10 . In addition, there is a risk of generalisation from research exploring rural persons with cancer as rural characteristics and culture differ greatly 6,11 . Furthermore, most of the research explores patients' experience, with little exploration of the experience of the carer 12 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%