Cancer incidence and mortality around the Pan Britannica Industries pesticide factory, Waltham Abbey.

Abstract

Objectives-To examine the incidence and mortality of cancer near the Pan Britannica Industries factory, Waltham Abbey, after reports of a possible cluster of all cancers and brain cancer in the vicinity. Method-Small area study of cancer incidence 1977-89, and mortality 1981-92, within a 7-5 km radius of the factory site. Postcoded cancer registrations and deaths in the study area were extracted from national data sets held by the Small Area Health Statistics Unit and compared with expected numbers computed by applying national rates stratified for age, sex, and deprivation to the local population (1981 and 1991 censuses). Observed/ expected (0(E) ratios were examined from 0-1 km and 0-7-5 km of the plant, and tests applied for a decline in relative risk with distance up to 7 5 km. Results-There were 12 859 incident cancers (1977-89) from 0-7-5 km (OlE ratio 1-04; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1*02 to 1-06) and 385 from 0-1 km (OlE 1*10; 1-00 to 1-22). There was an excess of skin melanoma from 0-1 km based on 11 cases (OIE 2-13; 1-06 to 3.80), and an excess from 0-7 5 km of cancer of the lung, stomach and pancreas combined, and prostate (O/Es ranged from 1-09 to 1.13). Only the findings from lung cancer were suggestive of a decline in risk with distance, especially in the later period . There were 9196 cancer deaths (1981-92) from 0-7 5 km (OlE 1-04; 95% CI 1-02 to 1.06) and 308 from 0-1 km (OlE 1-24; 1.11 to 1.39); and 25 507 non-cancer deaths (OIE 1-02; 1-01 to 1.04) from 0-7-5 km and 745 (OLE 1*14; 1-06 to 1-22) from 0-1 km. There was evidence of a decline in mortality with distance for all cancers combined, lung cancer (P = 0-001 for each), and colorectal cancer (P < 0.05), and also for non-cancers (P = 0*001).Proportional mortality analyses suggested a decline in risk with distance for lung cancer (P = 0.003) but not for all cancers or the site specific cancers examined. There was no evidence of an excess in the incidence or mortality from brain cancer. For cancer mortality in the innermost wards, the findings were, for the most part, well within the range of variation across the region as a whole. Conclusions-The study provides limited and inconsistent evidence for a localised excess of cancer in the vicinity of the PBI plant. At present, further investigation does not seem warranted other than continued surveillance of mortality and cancer incidence in the locality.

Plasma organochlorine levels and prostate cancer risk

“…There is epidemiological evidence to both support and refute the hypothesis that exposure to organochlorines and other environmental compounds acting as weak estrogens or anti-androgens might cause endocrine modulation, as well as produce a variety of adverse effects including potential prostate cancer (Wilkinson et al, 1997;Golden et al, 1998;Miller and Sharpe, 1998;Sonnenschein and Soto, 1998;Parent and Siemiatycki, 2001;Zafar and Terris, 2001). …”

Exposures and cancer incidence near oil fields in the Amazon basin of Ecuador

“…The general excess in all cancers argues against a specific toxic agent which might be expected to affect the incidence of only one or perhaps a few cancer sites 50. However, epidemiological studies have reported different types of cancer being associated with occupational or residential exposure to oil pollutants 17-23…”

Cancer mortality in towns in the vicinity of installations for the production of cement, lime, plaster, and magnesium oxide

“…In such cases, the toxins may pass into the trophic chain, affecting the population. Some authors have already shown associations between colorectal cancer and proximity to industrial pollution sources as metal industries (Garcia-Perez et al, 2010), mining , food and beverage sector and chemical plants (Wilkinson et al, 1997). As regards cement plants, a Brazilian study found a significant elevation on colorectal cancer mortality in an industrialized area with cement industries came into operation in the 1960s, among other facilities (MedradoFaria et al, 2001), and a Korean occupational study suggested a potential association between exposure in the cement industry and an increased risk of rectal cancer (Koh et al, 2013).…”