Cancer in the Time of Coronavirus: A Call for Crisis Oncology Standards of Care

Abstract

Since the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) was identified as a global pandemic, health systems have been severely strained, particularly affecting vulnerable populations such as patients with cancer. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, a variety of oncology specialty societies are making recommendations for standards of care. These diverse standards and gaps in standards can lead to inconsistent and heterogeneous care among governments, cancer centers, and even among oncologists within the same practice. These challenges highlight the need for a common nomenclature and crisis guidelines. For times of increased scarcity of resources, the National Academy of Medicine developed Crisis Standards of Care, defined as fairness, duty to care, duty to steward resources, transparency, consistency, proportionality, and accountability. However, we believe there is an urgent need to develop cancer-specific guidelines by convening a panel of experts from multiple specialties. These would be Crisis Oncology Standards of Care (COSCs) that are sensitive to both the individual cancer patient and to the broader health system in times of scarce resources, such as pandemic, natural disaster, or supply chain disruptions.

The Democratization of Scientific Conferences: Twitter in the Era of COVID-19 and Beyond

“…We envision four specific future directions for #HemeTwitter during future conferences and possibly even year-long: [ 1 ] presenter-developed #tweetorials about their research, [ 2 ] standardization of hashtags to facilitate the organization of tweeted content, [ 3 ] new intersections of research and advocacy interests between fields, and [ 4 ] timely trainee-focused Twitter journal clubs. Of these four, the first point is possibly the easiest to implement immediately.…”

“…One of the many seismic shifts induced by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been its impact on scientific discourse within medicine, including the field of malignant hematology [1][2][3][4][5]. The role of preprint servers for disseminating information and changing clinical practice (all prior to peer review) has risen substantially since January 2020 [6,7].…”

Examining the Impact of COVID-19 on Upper Manhattan Community-Based Organizations: A Qualitative Analysis of Employee Focus Groups

“…Consistent with focus group methodology, the moderator also asked follow-up questions ('probes') to allow participants to elaborate on relevant experiences and respond to one another. This guide was developed collaboratively by members of the study team based on the emerging literature related to the public health impacts of COVID-19, including the potential impacts on cancer-related risk factors, screening, and rates (Chandrasekaran & Ganesan, 2020;Kelkar & Cogle, 2020;Mitchell, 2020).…”

“…Furthermore, other services, such as routine screening for cancer, have been utilized less during the pandemic (Mitchell, 2020). For example, the first three months of the COVID-19 pandemic led to missing approximately 80,000 cases of cancer in the United States alone (Kelkar & Cogle, 2020). At a time when demands for services offered by CBOs would be expected to dramatically increase, i.e.…”