2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12920-020-00759-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cancer gene expression profiles associated with clinical outcomes to chemotherapy treatments

Abstract: Background Machine learning (ML) methods still have limited applicability in personalized oncology due to low numbers of available clinically annotated molecular profiles. This doesn’t allow sufficient training of ML classifiers that could be used for improving molecular diagnostics. Methods We reviewed published datasets of high throughput gene expression profiles corresponding to cancer patients with known responses on chemotherapy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Temozolomide has been considered to be the first-line chemotherapeutic agent in the treatment of glioma. According to the date from TCGA, glioma patients treated with temozolomide, as a previous study has selected [ 38 ], were divided into effective group (CR: complete response; PR: partial response; SD: stable disease) and ineffective group (PD: progressive disease). The risk score of each group was calculated and verified to be statistically significant between two groups ( Figure 9 A).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temozolomide has been considered to be the first-line chemotherapeutic agent in the treatment of glioma. According to the date from TCGA, glioma patients treated with temozolomide, as a previous study has selected [ 38 ], were divided into effective group (CR: complete response; PR: partial response; SD: stable disease) and ineffective group (PD: progressive disease). The risk score of each group was calculated and verified to be statistically significant between two groups ( Figure 9 A).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The area under the ROC curve (AUC) is frequently used for scoring molecular biomarkers in oncology [38][39][40][41]. It reflects biomarker robustness and depends on its sensitivity and specificity [42]. It varies between 0.5 and 1, AUC less 0.7 reflects no biomarker ability to discriminate patients by condition, and 0.7 to 0.8 threshold is considered acceptable in diagnostic test assessment, 0.8 to 0.9 is considered excellent, and more than 0.9 is considered outstanding [43][44][45].…”
Section: Reconstruction Of Frem2 Molecular Pathwaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then built the ROC curve and calculated the AUC metric for it. ROC AUC is widely used to assess the performance of biomarkers in oncology (41)(42)(43), and it depends on their sensitivity and specificity (44). It varies between 0.5 and 1, and the robustness criterion of biomarkers is typically AUC greater than 0.7 (45).…”
Section: Modeling Of Wes-rnaseq-tmb Correlation On Tcga Dataset With Matched Normal Wes Controlsmentioning
confidence: 99%