2010
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1009652107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cancer-derived mutations in the regulatory subunit p85α of phosphoinositide 3-kinase function through the catalytic subunit p110α

Abstract: Cancer-specific mutations in the iSH2 (inter-SH2) and nSH2 (Nterminal SH2) domains of p85α, the regulatory subunit of phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), show gain of function. They induce oncogenic cellular transformation, stimulate cellular proliferation, and enhance PI3K signaling. Quantitative determinations of oncogenic activity reveal large differences between individual mutants of p85α. The mutant proteins are still able to bind to the catalytic subunits p110α and p110β. Studies with isoform-specific… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
122
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
12
122
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that phosphopeptide activation of Class IA PI3-kinase involves a disinhibition of p110 (10), the partial loss of p85 inhibition in p110β would be expected to lead to a corresponding loss of activation when tyrosine phosphorylated proteins bind to the p85 nSH2 domain. This prediction also is consistent with a recent study showing that p85 mutations disrupting either the nSH2-helical domain interface or the iSH2-C2 domain interface act primarily through p110α rather than p110β (26). Although we observed ≈50% less phosphopeptide activation of p85/p110β dimers as compared with p85/p110α dimers in vitro, Nurnberg and coworkers (27) reported similar levels of phosphopeptide activation of p85/p110α and p85/p110β dimers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Given that phosphopeptide activation of Class IA PI3-kinase involves a disinhibition of p110 (10), the partial loss of p85 inhibition in p110β would be expected to lead to a corresponding loss of activation when tyrosine phosphorylated proteins bind to the p85 nSH2 domain. This prediction also is consistent with a recent study showing that p85 mutations disrupting either the nSH2-helical domain interface or the iSH2-C2 domain interface act primarily through p110α rather than p110β (26). Although we observed ≈50% less phosphopeptide activation of p85/p110β dimers as compared with p85/p110α dimers in vitro, Nurnberg and coworkers (27) reported similar levels of phosphopeptide activation of p85/p110α and p85/p110β dimers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In particular, we wanted to determine whether there is a difference between p110b inhibition as opposed to p110b deletion on oncogenic signals driven by MT or HER2/Neu. To investigate this, we isolated primary mammary tumor cells from tumorbearing MMTV-MT or MMTV-NeuT mice and subjected these cells to inhibitor studies using GDC-0941, a pan-PI3K inhibitor (Raynaud et al 2009); A66, a p110a-selective inhibitor (Sun et al 2010); and TGX-221, a p110b-selective inhibitor (Jackson et al 2005). We first determined that the amounts of p110a or p110b activity associated with the MT/p85 or NeuT/HER3/p85 complexes were not altered when cells were treated with these PI3K inhibitors (Supplemental Fig.…”
Section: The P110a Isoform Is Required For the Growth Of Established mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PIK75 has been used previously to study the role of PI3K(p110␣) but has some off-target activity (19,25). A66 is considered a more highly specific and selective inhibitor for p110␣ (20,21). The specificity of both inhibitors at different doses (0.1-100 M) was tested in NRVM with or without IGF1.…”
Section: Vmus3d Highlighted Pi3k(p110␣)-regulated Transcripts Encodinmentioning
confidence: 99%