2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2007.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cancellation problem of preconditioning method at low Mach numbers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3(c) provides a typical picture of checkerboard decoupling obtained by All-Speed-Roe scheme with the construction of Eqs. (8), (16), (17) and (18). It is obvious that traditional preconditioned Roe scheme is much better than All-Speed-Roe scheme in avoiding the checkerboard decoupling.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3(c) provides a typical picture of checkerboard decoupling obtained by All-Speed-Roe scheme with the construction of Eqs. (8), (16), (17) and (18). It is obvious that traditional preconditioned Roe scheme is much better than All-Speed-Roe scheme in avoiding the checkerboard decoupling.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non-dimensional conservative form of preconditioned governing equations (for inviscid and laminar cases) in vector form are written as follows [18,49,50]:…”
Section: Preconditioning Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a steady state, the solution of the modi fied (preconditioned) system coincides with that of the original system of equations. An unsteady solution is found by applying dual time stepping [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%