1959
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1959.tb03033.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canalization of the Scute Phenotype of Drosophila

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
81
0

Year Published

1959
1959
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The selected phenotype becomes less variable (more constrained) in response to these perturbations. Candidate examples from macroscopic to molecular phenotypes have been known for some time [82][83][84]. In wild populations subject to canalizing selection, more recently evolved traits can show greater variability compared with older traits, because canalizing selection has acted on the more recent traits for a shorter amount of time.…”
Section: Box 2 Canalizing Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selected phenotype becomes less variable (more constrained) in response to these perturbations. Candidate examples from macroscopic to molecular phenotypes have been known for some time [82][83][84]. In wild populations subject to canalizing selection, more recently evolved traits can show greater variability compared with older traits, because canalizing selection has acted on the more recent traits for a shorter amount of time.…”
Section: Box 2 Canalizing Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In stocks with a variable number of scutellar bristles the number and position of extra bristles can be modified by artificial selection (Payne, 1918;Sismanidis, 1942;Rendel, 1959;Fraser, 1963;Latter, 1964;Finlay, 1965;Druger, .1967;Gibson, 1968) and sometimes by temperature (Child, 1935;Pennycuick and Fraser, 1964;Gibson, 1969).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selection for high scutellar bristle number in a Drosophila melanogaster stock segregating for sese was found to be successful in an experiment already reported (Rendel 1959). Matings were between sc se males, chosen for high bristle number, and heterozygous females taken at random, all of which had four bristles in the early part of the experiment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%