Çanakkale Prehi̇stori̇k Dönem Arkeoloji̇k Yüzey Araştirmasi (Capas) 2021: Ezi̇ne Ve Çevresi̇ Sürtmetaş Alet Ve Objeleri̇

Bamyaci, Abdulvahap Onur; BATARAY, Nurettin

doi:10.18069/firatsbed.1077980

Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi

2022

DOI: 10.18069/firatsbed.1077980

|View full text |Cite

Çanakkale Prehi̇stori̇k Dönem Arkeoloji̇k Yüzey Araştirmasi (Capas) 2021: Ezi̇ne Ve Çevresi̇ Sürtmetaş Alet Ve Objeleri̇

Abdulvahap Onur Bamyaci

Nurettin BATARAY

Abstract: Bu çalışmada, Antik dönemde Troas olarak anılan Çanakkale ve çevresi, Kuzey Ege'de Biga yarımadasının önemli bir bölümünü kaplamaktadır. Bölge, Asya ve Avrupa'yı birbirine bağlayan geçiş güzergâhlarının üzerinde yer alması, aynı zamanda Marmara ve Ege Denizi arasındaki boğaz geçişini sağlayan bir konumda yer alması önemini daha da arttırmaktadır. Bölgede yapılan arkeolojik araştırmalar, özellikle görkemli antik kentlerin bulunduğu kıyı bölgeleri üzerinde yoğunlaşmış ve uzun yıllardan beri sürdürülmektedir. Yaz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Baysal 2016. 24 Atalay 2009Ayhan 1999;Bamyacı 2017;Baykal 1980;Baysal 2010;Güldoğan 2002;Sırlan 2019;Türkmen 2009. …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Yaratıcılık ve Yorum Arasında: Öğütme Taşları

BAYSAL¹

2021

Anadolu (Anatolia)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In Turkey, archaeological research has developed more with the scientific understanding of 'doing excavation' than a concept of 'the adequacy of digging'. Of course, archaeological research should involve excavation, but scientific understanding cannot be limited to this. Excavation is one of the techniques used by the science of archaeology. When we start from this point, excavation work should be as successful at knowing and understanding the past which is the essence of science, creating knowledge of this and sharing this information, using it and making it accessible to everyone as at excavation itself. However much archaeological work is generally understood as the ritual of excavating the soil to find 'new unknowns' (or 'newly rediscovered), and, having restored them, giving them to museums, this situation only makes up an accumulation of material culture and its visuality. Despite the focus on the enrichment of Turkish archaeology since the 1960s with interdisciplinary research and the putting into practice multidisciplinary research, today it is difficult to move on without asking to what extent this has been successful. Archaeology, even if it has been reduced to the scale of excavation today, is a discipline generally evaluated as the system of the scientific practice of excavation operating within the triangle of theory, method, and practice. Today we can observe that it is in a position where the first of these is largely ignored, the second has not yet been seen and the third is taken directly or sometimes piecemeal from the excavation systems developed by German, American or English archaeology. Within this archaeology, based on the third process of the triangle, interpretation, which needs to take place after excavation, is among the most important of the missing components. Based on this general view, this study of ground stone industries, which have long been neglected in the archaeology of this country, is shaped in such a way as to be an example. In this study, which underlines the question of where the stone tools in question are and where they should lie in archaeology between inventiveness and interpretation, an attempt is made to lay the foundation for ground stones in the first corner of the above-mentioned triangle. Also, however much it is claimed that archaeology is a multidisciplinary field, I aim to show that this is not true when looked at from the perspective of ground stones.

show abstract

“…Baysal 2016. 24 Atalay 2009Ayhan 1999;Bamyacı 2017;Baykal 1980;Baysal 2010;Güldoğan 2002;Sırlan 2019;Türkmen 2009. …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Yaratıcılık ve Yorum Arasında: Öğütme Taşları

BAYSAL¹

2021

Anadolu (Anatolia)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Çanakkale Prehi̇stori̇k Dönem Arkeoloji̇k Yüzey Araştirmasi (Capas) 2021: Ezi̇ne Ve Çevresi̇ Sürtmetaş Alet Ve Objeleri̇

Cited by 1 publication

References 15 publications

Yaratıcılık ve Yorum Arasında: Öğütme Taşları

Yaratıcılık ve Yorum Arasında: Öğütme Taşları

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About