2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.rama.2018.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canadian Prairie Rangeland and Seeded Forage Classification Using Multiseason Landsat 8 and Summer RADARSAT-2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are consistent with the rationale that: (1) low biomass crops (soybean) could be more readily misclassified as non-crop when using L-band, leading to relatively poorer accuracy; and (2) high biomass crops (corn) could be more readily classified as a non-crop due to the signal saturating over time resulting in smaller CV. This section compares CV values Rangelands type land cover classes, such as grassland and pastures, are difficult to separate from other land covers [18,[42][43][44][45]. This is also reflected in our results, Figures 7 and 8 show that classifications of grassland and pasture at L-band are a toss-up; overall accuracy would not appreciably change whether we considered it a crop or non-crop a priori (CV values are close to CV thr , Figure 7), whereas in the C-band, those land covers classify much more clearly as non-crop (CV values are clearly lower than CV thr , Figure 7).…”
Section: Comparison Of Coefficient Of Variation To In Situ Biomass Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are consistent with the rationale that: (1) low biomass crops (soybean) could be more readily misclassified as non-crop when using L-band, leading to relatively poorer accuracy; and (2) high biomass crops (corn) could be more readily classified as a non-crop due to the signal saturating over time resulting in smaller CV. This section compares CV values Rangelands type land cover classes, such as grassland and pastures, are difficult to separate from other land covers [18,[42][43][44][45]. This is also reflected in our results, Figures 7 and 8 show that classifications of grassland and pasture at L-band are a toss-up; overall accuracy would not appreciably change whether we considered it a crop or non-crop a priori (CV values are close to CV thr , Figure 7), whereas in the C-band, those land covers classify much more clearly as non-crop (CV values are clearly lower than CV thr , Figure 7).…”
Section: Comparison Of Coefficient Of Variation To In Situ Biomass Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pasture class consisted of areas cleared for grazing, previously used for some form of agriculture production or currently cultivated non-native grasses used for feed or seed production. An important distinction between cropland and cultivated pasture was based on previous findings that these pastures were distinguishable from grasslands and croplands related to earlier spring greenup [37]. However, this has not been widely examined across the prairie region.…”
Section: Change In Cropping Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detection of grassland types as native and non-native is an important need in the prairie region regarding biodiversity and wildlife habitat [2]. Previous research has shown some potential to separate these grasslands and seeded forage pastures to varying degrees using seasonal data [35][36][37] or detecting evidence of plowing with lidar data in [38]. Results show that research is progressing, but data is currently insufficient for assessment across the entire prairie extent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hoy en día, una gran cantidad de productos derivados de satélites se encuentran en el dominio público o pronto a ser liberados, lo cual los convierte en recursos valiosos y accesibles para ser utilizados por investigadores y tomadores de decisión (Simons et al, 2016). Entre ellos se destacan los productos Landsat, que han sido y continúan siendo de gran aplicación en diferentes análisis temporales de cambios en las coberturas y usos del suelo (Alam et al, 2020;Chen et al, 2021;Jaramillo & Antunes, 2018;Lara & Gandini, 2014;Lindsay et al, 2019;Pflugmacher et al, 2019;Sequeira et al, 2016;Somoza et al, 2021b;Vazquez et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified