2019
DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canadian neurosurgeons’ views on medical assistance in dying (MAID): a cross-sectional survey of Canadian Neurosurgical Society (CNSS) members

Abstract: BackgroundThe Supreme Court of Canada removed the prohibition on physicians assisting in patients dying on 6 February 2015. Bill C-14, legalising medical assistance in dying (MAID) in Canada, was subsequently passed by the House of Commons and the Senate on 17 June 2016. As this remains a divisive issue for physicians, the Canadian Neurosurgical Society (CNSS) has recently published a position statement on MAID.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey to understand the views and perceptions among CNSS memb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(8 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, we have concluded that of those that responded, their preliminary overall position on this contentious issue was favourable, with 62.8% of respondents being in support of MAID and 82.4% supporting the right of physicians to participate in MAID when the appropriate criteria are satisfied. These results are similar to those from the survey of all neurosurgeons within the Canadian Neurosurgical Society, with their study showing 73% support for MAID, and 74% supporting the right of physicians to participate [11] . There was no statistical difference seen with respect to stance on MAID and years of experience, location of practice, or specialty.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, we have concluded that of those that responded, their preliminary overall position on this contentious issue was favourable, with 62.8% of respondents being in support of MAID and 82.4% supporting the right of physicians to participate in MAID when the appropriate criteria are satisfied. These results are similar to those from the survey of all neurosurgeons within the Canadian Neurosurgical Society, with their study showing 73% support for MAID, and 74% supporting the right of physicians to participate [11] . There was no statistical difference seen with respect to stance on MAID and years of experience, location of practice, or specialty.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…These results are similar to those from the survey of all neurosurgeons within the Canadian Neurosurgical Society, with their study showing 73% support for MAID, and 74% supporting the right of physicians to participate. [11] There was no statistical difference seen with respect to stance on MAID and years of experience, location of practice, or specialty. However, we note that the small number of respondents means that the study was not powered to detect a statistically significant effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This section permits health practitioners to conscientiously object, however, it mandates health practitioners to refer the patient onto another health practitioner, who does not have a CO. This condition on CO helps ensure that a woman's access to a termination is not compromised by a health professional's CO. Research on the rates of objection amongst health professionals to the legalization of assisted dying suggests objection can range from 47 to 68 per cent (Clark et al 2001;Ganzini et al 2001;Turla et al 2007;Karapetis et al 2018;Althagafi et al 2019). Notably, it is often found that the number of willing providers is much lower than the percentage of health professionals who support assisted dying/euthanasia.…”
Section: Vad In Victoriamentioning
confidence: 99%