2022
DOI: 10.1111/capa.12463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canadian graduate programs in public administration: The state of the field

Abstract: Graduate public administration programs at Canadian universities have seen significant growth and change over the last fifteen years. This research note assesses current programming and considers recent developments. We argue that Canadian public administration programs exhibit diversity and that they are responsive to key trends and forces shaping society. To support these claims, we compare program curriculums and highlight distinguishing features. We suggest in closing, though, that further adjustments are … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Public administration researchers in Canadian universities typically teach in public administration/policy programs across the country. These professional programs are usually course‐intensive with the primary aim to prepare their students for careers in the public sector (Roberge & Oduro, 2022). Researchers often face time constraints due to competing priorities of teaching versus research, relatively low access to research trainees in comparison to research‐intensive academic programs, and a relatively insufficient research infrastructure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Public administration researchers in Canadian universities typically teach in public administration/policy programs across the country. These professional programs are usually course‐intensive with the primary aim to prepare their students for careers in the public sector (Roberge & Oduro, 2022). Researchers often face time constraints due to competing priorities of teaching versus research, relatively low access to research trainees in comparison to research‐intensive academic programs, and a relatively insufficient research infrastructure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%