1981
DOI: 10.1037/h0081137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canadian feminism and psychology: The first decade.

Abstract: The history of the Canadian Psychological Association's recognition of the validity of a feminist perspective in psychology is outlined together with an overview of the current status of women psychologists in the nation. Documenting the development of a psychology of women speciality, a selected review of the research conducted by psychologists in Canada dealing with sex roles, sex differences, achievement, feminism and psychobiology, is presented. In the applied areas of the discipline analogous developments… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, North American commentators have suggested that clinical and applied psychologists reflect distinct groups relative to experimental psychologists (Kimble, 1984; Matarazzo, 1987), with each group claiming that the other is preferentially assigned more rewards (e.g., grants, status within the larger research community) than they in fact merit (e.g., Hebb, 1948). For similar reasons, others have suggested establishing and maintaining sections of professional organizations (Pyke & Stark-Adamec, 1981) and awards within psychology that specifically recognize the contributions of women (Gurevich, 2001). These observations and suggestions reflect the features of a heterarchy.…”
Section: Social Network and Social Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, North American commentators have suggested that clinical and applied psychologists reflect distinct groups relative to experimental psychologists (Kimble, 1984; Matarazzo, 1987), with each group claiming that the other is preferentially assigned more rewards (e.g., grants, status within the larger research community) than they in fact merit (e.g., Hebb, 1948). For similar reasons, others have suggested establishing and maintaining sections of professional organizations (Pyke & Stark-Adamec, 1981) and awards within psychology that specifically recognize the contributions of women (Gurevich, 2001). These observations and suggestions reflect the features of a heterarchy.…”
Section: Social Network and Social Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting to note, first, that they are brought into play despite the fact that the first proposal for a Psychology of Women Section in the IJK (undated, c. May/June 1985) included a deliberate attempt to educate, in setting out the scope of the field: this was clearly ignored. Second, there has been some attempt in most of these countries (although not always 262 Sue Wilkinson dovetailing with attempts to organise) to prepare and/ or publish reviews of the field that seem to serve both an educational and a self-justificatory function (e.g., Winkler, Smith, Dagleish, & Gault, 1975, for Australia;Pyke & Stark-Adamec, 1981, for Canada).…”
Section: Site 2: the Content Of The New Sub-disciplinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feminist psychology in North America emerged as a formally organized, distinct community of scholars in 1969 with the formation of AWP, whose members pushed for the creation of Division 35 (Psychology of Women) of the APA. Parallel efforts took place in Canada around the same time and resulted in the organization.known today as the Section on Women and Psychology (SWAP) of the Canadian Psychological Association (CPA) (Pyke & Stark-Adamec, 1981). These developments took place within the larger social context of the women's movement, and feminist psychology has always been explicit in acknowledging its emancipatory values and goals.…”
Section: Objectivismmentioning
confidence: 99%