Can You Hear Us Now? Stances Towards Interaction and Rapport

Abstract

This chapter examines two key factors that influence the efficacy of online learning: student and teacher interaction and rapport. These two factors are heavily influenced by the stance that the learner takes. Online learning is opening up more possibilities for lifelong learning. This chapter will provide a critical discussion of online education, the theories that ground this delivery system, and the challenges that one university faculty had in creating a community of learners in a technology-mediated learning environment. “Let’s put our Reading Masters courses online,” the Dean suggested. “We need to move our graduate course offerings into the twenty-first century. Can’t be left behind.” She left the six of us in the conference room to talk over her proposal. But what was there to discuss? The answer was “No.” It just wasn’t possible. We’d lose that personal connection with our students that our university is known for. We’d lose those rousing discussions and meaningful interactions. Why, the students wouldn’t even see each other, let alone see us. How could we encourage lifelong learning when we weren’t even sold on the idea? The whole idea was impractical, unworkable, and inconceivable. Putting our courses online? Out of the question!

Blended workplace learning: the value of human interaction

“…Human interaction has been shown to increase interest in, understanding of, and engagement with course content through reflection and dialogue about content with non-course-related people (McDonald, 2013). Online human interaction is also found to enhance engagement with learning content through increased connection with other texts and readings (Wegmann and McCauley, 2007, 2014). While these findings shed some light on learners’ interaction and engagement in blended learning, a thematic analysis of the first decade of blended learning literature found a need for more focused research into learner engagement as well as the connection between human interaction and other aspects of engagement (Halverson et al , 2014).…”