‘Can you hear me?’: communication, relationship and ethics in video-based telepsychiatric consultations

Abstract

Telepsychiatry has long been discussed as a supplement to or substitute for face-to-face therapeutic consultations. The current pandemic crisis has fueled the development in an unprecedented way. More and more psychiatric consultations are now carried out online as video-based consultations. Treatment results appear to be comparable with those of face-to-face care in terms of clinical outcome, acceptance, adherence and patient satisfaction. However, evidence on videoconferencing in a variety of different fields indicates that there are extensive changes in the communication behaviour in online conversations. We hypothesise that this might impact ethically relevant aspects of the therapeutic relationship, which plays a prominent role in psychiatry. In this paper, we review effects of video-based consultations on communication between therapists and patients in psychiatry. Based on a common understanding of video-based consultations as changing the lived experience of communication, we categorise these effects according to sensory, spatial and technical aspects. Departing from a power-based model of therapeutic relationships, we then discuss the ethical significance of this changed communication situation, based on dimensions of respect for autonomy, lucidity, fidelity, justice and humanity. We conclude that there is evidence for ethically relevant changes of the therapeutic relationship in video-based telepsychiatric consultations. These changes need to be more carefully considered in psychiatric practice and future studies.

Patient and provider perspectives of the implementation of remote consultations for community-dwelling people with mental health conditions: A systematic mixed studies review

“…The finding of the perceived impaired therapeutic relationship contrasts with some studies of effectiveness of telemental health ( Hubley et al, 2016 ), while other reviews have recognised this as a potential limitation of telemental health ( Connolly et al, 2020 ; Siegel et al, 2021 ). Perceptions of this impeded therapeutic relationship warrants further research as it has many ethical implications if not addressed ( Frittgen and Haltaufderheide, 2022 ).…”

Second Mind: Considerações Ético‐Legais sobre a Digitalização em Saúde Mental no Contexto Português

“…23 Por fim, é útil ainda pensar no papel desempenhado pelo contacto e gestualidade na construção de uma relação empática entre médico e doente, e que o condicionar desta "humanidade" do processo deverá ter sido em conta aquando da sua avaliação e planeamento. 36…”

Interprofessional collaboration in telemedicine for long‐term care: An exploratory qualitative study

“…While published literature has demonstrated increased access to care, convenience, and positive impacts for NH residents and staff through digital technologies, there is a lack of insight into interprofessional collaboration, communication patterns and behavior in teleconsultations. Although clear communication and information transmission is essential to maintain quality in technologically mediated care provision (Frittgen & Haltaufderheide, 2022), there remains little research focus on how providers communicate and collaborate for clinical decision-making through video-mediated consultations. Greenberg and Gutwin (2016) posit that the awareness required for development of mutual understanding between individuals is not present in video-mediated communications, unlike in face-to-face interaction.…”