2021
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18030856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can We Use Grip Strength to Predict Other Types of Hand Exertions? An Example of Manufacturing Industry Workers

Abstract: Background: There are different types of hand motions in people’s daily lives and working environments. However, testing duration increases as the types of hand motions increase to build a normative database. Long testing duration decreases the motivation of study participants. The purpose of this study is to propose models to predict pinch and press strength using grip strength. Methods: One hundred ninety-eight healthy volunteers were recruited from the manufacturing industries in Central Taiwan. The five ty… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 50 publications
(109 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical research indicates that weaker grip strengths are related to decreased functional mobility, higher mortality rates, and an increased chance of cognitive decline (Carson, 2018; Vancampfort et al, 2019). In addition, grip strength readings are often used as a method for clinical professionals to evaluate the efficacy of different rehabilitation strategies for patients with upper extremity impairments (Sirajudeen et al, 2012; Lo et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical research indicates that weaker grip strengths are related to decreased functional mobility, higher mortality rates, and an increased chance of cognitive decline (Carson, 2018; Vancampfort et al, 2019). In addition, grip strength readings are often used as a method for clinical professionals to evaluate the efficacy of different rehabilitation strategies for patients with upper extremity impairments (Sirajudeen et al, 2012; Lo et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%