2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00370.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can We Safely Apply the Ottawa Ankle Rules to Children?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5 years of age with blunt trauma to the ankle or midfoot. 16 Our study indicates that the majority of Canadian PEPs use the OAR when evaluating ankle and foot injuries. Those who used the rules were more likely to have recently completed a residency program and not be primary PEPs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…5 years of age with blunt trauma to the ankle or midfoot. 16 Our study indicates that the majority of Canadian PEPs use the OAR when evaluating ankle and foot injuries. Those who used the rules were more likely to have recently completed a residency program and not be primary PEPs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Así, su versatilidad conlleva a la aplicación por cualquier médico que labore en el servicio de emergencias y no solo por médicos traumatólogos (Runyon, 2009). Por tanto, las Reglas de Ottawa son de gran utilidad para el tamizaje de lesiones de tobillo y pie por su alta sensibilidad (alto poder de exclusión), pero con valores de especificidad variables.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Despite several clinical trials carried out on children, there are still worries about the usage of these rules in the pediatric age 7 . Although clinicians have knowledge about this clinical decision rule and how to apply it in clinical practice, less than 50% use it at a regular basis 2 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Despite several clinical trials carried out on children, there are still worries about the usage of these rules in the pediatric age. 7 Although clinicians have knowledge about this clinical decision rule and how to apply it in clinical practice, less than 50% use it at a regular basis. 2 Therefore, the primary aims of this study were to determine the applicability of the OARs in a general pediatric ED and its reliability to safely manage ankle and midfoot injuries, the impact in reducing the number of radiographs, the healthcare costs, and the time spent in the ED.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%