2019
DOI: 10.1596/1813-9450-9052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can we Rely on VIIRS Nightlights to Estimate the Short-Term Impacts of Natural Disasters?

Abstract: The Policy Research Working Paper Series disseminates the findings of work in progress to encourage the exchange of ideas about development issues. An objective of the series is to get the findings out quickly, even if the presentations are less than fully polished. The papers carry the names of the authors and should be cited accordingly. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the authors. They do not necessarily represent the views of the International Ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The VIIRS data are considered superior (higher-resolution images, on-board calibration, better sensors, and non-saturated measurements), and future or shorter time span research is likely to utilize the VIIRS. However, despite these advantages, Skoufias et al (2021) found that the VIIRS data do not yield significant results either for specific hazard events or for country level regressions. This is most likely due to the inherent noise in the data and the lack of good measurements due to cloud cover in certain regions.…”
Section: Nightlightsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The VIIRS data are considered superior (higher-resolution images, on-board calibration, better sensors, and non-saturated measurements), and future or shorter time span research is likely to utilize the VIIRS. However, despite these advantages, Skoufias et al (2021) found that the VIIRS data do not yield significant results either for specific hazard events or for country level regressions. This is most likely due to the inherent noise in the data and the lack of good measurements due to cloud cover in certain regions.…”
Section: Nightlightsmentioning
confidence: 87%