Can we negotiate? Trust and the rule of law in the smart city paradigm

Keymolen, Esther; Voorwinden, Astrid

doi:10.1080/13600869.2019.1588844

Cited by 31 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 47 publications

(38 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Intelligence reduces the cost of urban community governance refinement with process optimization. Information technology has changed the traditional way of information communication [19][20][21][22].…”

Section: Structural Optimization Design Analysis Of Smart Citymentioning

confidence: 99%

Game Analysis of Dynamic Planning Evolution for the Optimization of Community Governance Structure in Smart Cities

Liang

2021

Complexity

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, we study the structural optimization of community governance in smart cities and optimize the structure based on the game analysis of dynamic planning evolution. Theoretically, the connotation and extension of the concept of “self-organization” are cleared, and the environment and conditions of community self-organization formation, the formation process of community self-organization, and the types of community self-organization are discussed. The so-called “self-organization” is a process of spontaneously moving from disorder to order, and the environment and conditions of community self-organization are mainly the openness, nonequilibrium state, and nonlinearity of the system. The key parameters of the contract with the change of the values of each factor make up for the inability to collect data for the empirical study in this paper; then, it presents four linear stages along with the cause such as self-creation, self-expansion, self-maintenance, and self-degeneration, respectively. The types of community self-organization mainly include community self-organization with random aggregation, socialized community self-organization, and stable community self-organization with autonomy orientation. By systematically sorting out the relationship between community self-organization and government, while confirming the positive significance of community self-organization to community cultural governance, various complex conflicts and game relationships will deeply affect the actual effectiveness of cultural governance and provide useful knowledge reference for future community cultural governance.

show abstract

Section: Structural Optimization Design Analysis Of Smart Citymentioning

confidence: 99%

Game Analysis of Dynamic Planning Evolution for the Optimization of Community Governance Structure in Smart Cities

Liang

2021

Complexity

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Coupled with the trend of datafication, in smart cities "people are now subject to much greater levels of intensified scrutiny and modes of surveillance and dataveillance than ever before, with smart city technologies providing deeply personal pictures of individual lives" (Kitchin 2016, p. 31). Several critics have emphasized the risks of smart technologies for privacy, discrimination, and marginalization of certain groups along income and racial lines, due to the fact that crime data reflect longstanding institutional biases (e.g., Harcourt 2007;Monahan 2017;Smith et al 2017;Peeters and Schuilenburg 2018;Keymolen and Voorwinden 2019;Pali and Schuilenburg 2019).…”

Section: Ethical Issues Of Smart Cities For Citizensmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Nevertheless, the use of smart technologies raises several ethical issues. These include, among others, large-scale surveillance of citizens, the erosion of privacy, lack of transparency and accountability, limited consultation of citizens into how smart technology is designed and implemented, control creep, privatization of public services, and issues around the ownership of data (e.g., Vanolo 2014;Keymolen and Voorwinden 2019;Kitchin 2019b;Sadowski and Bendor 2019). While smart technologies have the potential to deliver significant gains, these technologies are able to create new or exacerbate existing imbalances of power in our cities.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reclaiming the Smart City: Toward a New Right to the City

Galič

Schuilenburg

2020

Handbook of Smart Cities

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This chapter explicates that the smart city is defined by a techno-utopian discourse, which presents smart technology as a value-neutral and rational tool in solving all kinds of urban problems. After analyzing several ethical issues relating to the smart city concept, Lefebvre's notion of the "right to the city" from the 1960s is examined. While the Lefebvrian "right to the city" is a utopian project, it offers an opportunity to reflect upon what an emancipatory and fair smart city should be like. We examine the current debate on the smart city by looking at three contemporary perspectives on the "right to the city." The chapter concludes by describing three trajectories that could lead to a more open, flexible, diverse, and participatory smart city, particularly in relation to issues of (a) participation, (b) communing, and (c) citizenship. These trajectories are illustrated by providing examples of different smart initiatives in the city of Barcelona.

show abstract

“…The supra modern city has become a battleground for various market forces and the socio-political process of placing the icon of consumerism. It causes many urban problems that lead to increased inequality, alienation, and intolerance in public spaces (Keymolen & Voorwinden 2019, Von Schonfeld & Bertolini 2016. In the context of a smart city, the government supervise and control urban public spaces, including the sidewalk.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The public rights to the sidewalk in a smart city framework: The case study of Surabaya

Aminah

2021

MKP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The pedestrian transformation in Surabaya smart city system encountered critical problem for pedestrians because transformation as a public space has reduced citizens’ rights to the city. Dominant forces tend to subordinate street vendors or Pedagang Kaki Lima (PKL), who require public space. The city or urban government produces pedestrians as public spaces to support the ‘Smart City’ concept. This study explores the government’s ability to guarantee citizens’ rights to the city. In addition, this study seeks to observe the process of public space transformation in cities that implement smart city systems and analyze spatial street vendors’ practices in the pedestrian space. This research applies the right to cities and public space from a Marxian spatial perspective. This research is a case study that uses a qualitative method and interpretive analysis. Research findings indicate pedestrians’ paradox due to the government’s dispossession process to protect pedestrians through ‘furniturization’ policies that reduce smart city implementation. In conclusion, there are dynamics of spatial practice and social expression as pedestrian problems. The smart city system’s implementation causes the loss of fulfillment of the poor and street vendors’ needs and rights to participate inclusively in the social and political process in managing the city’s public spaces.

show abstract

Can we negotiate? Trust and the rule of law in the smart city paradigm

Cited by 31 publications

References 47 publications

Game Analysis of Dynamic Planning Evolution for the Optimization of Community Governance Structure in Smart Cities

Game Analysis of Dynamic Planning Evolution for the Optimization of Community Governance Structure in Smart Cities

Reclaiming the Smart City: Toward a New Right to the City

The public rights to the sidewalk in a smart city framework: The case study of Surabaya

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About