2015
DOI: 10.3390/rel6041457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can We Move Beyond the Secular State?

Abstract: Abstract:The article argues for re-consideration of the secularization so often in the West regarded as an essential condition for a democratic state. Its inbuilt incoherence and problematic consequences suggest that the term secular should be abandoned. Deep-seated reasons for objecting to such a proposal follow, discussing an affront to personal integrity, confronting intellectual apartheid and analysing abuse of religion. A way forward is suggested in learning to accept unavoidable levels of uncertainty, so… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When each of the two tries to escape the other, it generates its own problems. Watson (2015Watson ( :1459 meticulously maintains that in g enhancing principles of democracy, secularisation violates the same principles it propagates. For example, democracy presupposes pluralism, and to privatise religion is essentially the exclusion of it from public plural life.…”
Section: Lesotho's Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When each of the two tries to escape the other, it generates its own problems. Watson (2015Watson ( :1459 meticulously maintains that in g enhancing principles of democracy, secularisation violates the same principles it propagates. For example, democracy presupposes pluralism, and to privatise religion is essentially the exclusion of it from public plural life.…”
Section: Lesotho's Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in somewhat popular (Watson 2015) as much as in academic circles -with Benson (e.g. 2010Benson (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%