2012
DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/29/11/115011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can we measure structures to a precision better than the Planck length?

Abstract: Abstract.It was recently claimed that the Planck length is not a limit to the precision by which we can measure distances, but that instead it is merely the Planck volume that limits the precision by which we can measure volumes. Here, we investigate this claim and show that the argument does not support the conclusion.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in view of the fact that our background is now by assumption minkowskian. Note that in order to ensure that in the spherical case (∆x 1 = ∆x 2 = ∆x 3 = 2∆R with obvious notation) we have A = 4π∆R 2 , we need to take β 2 = 3/(π) [15]. We estimate the energy of the collapsing field configuration making use of Heisenberg's uncertainty relations…”
Section: For Asymptotically Flat Data Horizons Form If and Only Ifmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…in view of the fact that our background is now by assumption minkowskian. Note that in order to ensure that in the spherical case (∆x 1 = ∆x 2 = ∆x 3 = 2∆R with obvious notation) we have A = 4π∆R 2 , we need to take β 2 = 3/(π) [15]. We estimate the energy of the collapsing field configuration making use of Heisenberg's uncertainty relations…”
Section: For Asymptotically Flat Data Horizons Form If and Only Ifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where of course ∆ ω A is just a shorthand as in (8). It is obtained by making use of inequality (15) to eliminate the dependence on the three-volume ∆ ω V in (24) and substituting √ ∆A ≤ ∆η i in (25). For the sake of definiteness, we collect below some desirable properties of a "concrete quantum model".…”
Section: Models Of Quantum Expanding Spacetimesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the HUP framework, the restriction upon the position measurement precision does not exist. On the contrary, in the GUP framework that can be regarded as a phenomenological description of quantum gravity effects, a minimal position measurement precision is predicted with the order of the Planck length ℓ Pl = G /c 3 ∼ 10 −33 cm below which the spacetime cannot be probed effectively [10,11,12,13]. In other words, a finite resolution appears in the spacetime.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Some physicists would claim they are just mathematical artifacts with no implications for physics whatsoever, while others think there could be a unit smaller than the Planck length (Agarwal & Pathak, 2004;Ghosh, Roy, Genes, & Vitali, 2009;Zurek, 2001), and still others maintain that there should be no minimum length at all -that zero is the minimum. Nevertheless, the majority of physicists seem to agree that there is a minimum length and that it likely is the Planck length (see Adler, 2010;Ali, Khalil, & Vagenas, 2015;Garay, 1995;Hossenfelder, 2012;Padmanabhan, 1985). Later in this paper, we will point out recent progress in physics strongly indicating that the Planck length is indeed truly essential, and something that we can observe without relying on the Planck length formula.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%