2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-5187-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can We Estimate Short- and Intermediate-term Survival in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Metastatic Bone Disease?

Abstract: Background Objective means of estimating survival can be used to guide surgical decision-making and to risk-stratify patients for clinical trials. Although a free, online tool (www. pathfx.org) can estimate 3-and 12-month survival, recent work, including a survey of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society, indicated that estimates at 1 and 6 months after surgery also would be helpful. Longer estimates help justify the need for more durable and expensive reconstructive options, and very short estimates could help ide… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
48
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
6
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We report a 30-day mortality of 13.4% which Median values and interquartile ranges reported for age, albumin, haemoglobin and time of diagnosis of cancer to incidence of pathological fracture is similar to that previously reported (2.6 to 12%) [14][15][16]. One-year and 2-year mortality in our patients were 67% and 85.7% respectively, compared to previously reported mortality rates of 60-83% at 1 year and 70-94% at 2 years [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Regarding short-term outcomes, poor ASA and functional status have been previously found to be significant risk factors for 30-day mortality [15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We report a 30-day mortality of 13.4% which Median values and interquartile ranges reported for age, albumin, haemoglobin and time of diagnosis of cancer to incidence of pathological fracture is similar to that previously reported (2.6 to 12%) [14][15][16]. One-year and 2-year mortality in our patients were 67% and 85.7% respectively, compared to previously reported mortality rates of 60-83% at 1 year and 70-94% at 2 years [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Regarding short-term outcomes, poor ASA and functional status have been previously found to be significant risk factors for 30-day mortality [15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Primaries from paired structures such as the breast, prostate, lungs, thyroid and kidneys are known to metastasise to bone commonly, with the femur being the most likely long bone to be affected by bony metastasis (44%) [1]. Patients with metastatic pathological femur fractures are associated with higher mortality rates of 60-83% at 1-year and 70-94% at 2 years after surgical treatment [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] compared with the 1-year mortality rate of about 12 to 37% for traumatic hip fractures [10]. Nevertheless, surgical intervention may be necessary to restore function and provide pain relief.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In their study, Ogura and colleagues performed external validation in a Japanese population of the PATHFx model (www.pathfx.org) that predicts 1, 3, 6 and 12-month postsurgical survival of patients with skeletal metastases. The PATHFx model was developed and validated for Western countries patients [2][3][4]9], and the validation in an Asian population therefore represents a step forward in the evaluation of the applicability of model worldwide.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%