1999
DOI: 10.2307/1182947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can We Control Cheating in the Classroom?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
74
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
74
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It appears that poor performers either feel entitled to cheat in a system that does not give them any legitimate opportunities to succeed, or they engage in a "face-saving" activity to avoid embarrassment for their poor performance. 20 This result corresponds with earlier findings that cheating in the classroom is particularly common among poor performers (Kerkvliet and Sigmund, 1999;Bunn et al, 1992).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It appears that poor performers either feel entitled to cheat in a system that does not give them any legitimate opportunities to succeed, or they engage in a "face-saving" activity to avoid embarrassment for their poor performance. 20 This result corresponds with earlier findings that cheating in the classroom is particularly common among poor performers (Kerkvliet and Sigmund, 1999;Bunn et al, 1992).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Previous economic research has particularly investigated cheating in the classroom and confirmed that people with low grade point average (GPA), who have more to gain, cheat more than students with high GPA (Kerkvliet and Sigmund, 1999;Bunn et al, 1992). Furthermore, it has been illustrated that cheating behaviour can be reduced by increasing the costs of being caught (Kerkvliet and Sigmund, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kerkvliet and Sigmund (1999) in their study found that increasing the distance between students in an examination has some effect on academic misconduct. Bowers (1964), indicated that it has been found that student cheating rates rise significantly, the more the students spend on extra-curricular activities of playing cards watching television or drinking with friends.…”
Section: Studies On the Influence Of Social-academic Environmentmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Ainda assim, para lá das políticas institucionais, é a conduta dos docentes e o grau de identificação dos estudantes com as matérias ensinadas que muitas vezes se convertem em fatores inibidores ou potenciadores da fraude (Kerkvliet e Sigmund, 1999) A literatura tem vindo a mostrar que a fraude académica é uma variável dependente da área disciplinar em que se estuda, do sucesso académico, da realização ou não de atividades extracurriculares, da idade e do sexo, mas também de fatores externos ligados a um mercado que disponibiliza crescentemente canais de disseminação da fraude (McCabe e Trevino, 1997;Osipian, 2012). Áreas científicas como o direito e as ciências económicas ou empresariais tendem a ser, em regra, mais vulneráveis à fraude académica.…”
unclassified