2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2017.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can we continue to effectively police digital crime?

Abstract: Now approximately 30years old, the field of digital forensics is arguably facing some of its greatest challenges to date. Whilst currently supporting law enforcement in numerous criminal cases annually, questions are beginning to emerge regarding whether it can sustain this contribution, with digital crime remaining prevalent. In his first live interview in September 2015, Head of MI5, Andrew Parker indicated that individuals are now engaging in computing acts which are beyond the control of authorities, confi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The question remains open. G. Horsman notes that, despite the fact that law enforcement agencies are currently combating digital crime, the question still arises as to whether they can maintain this level in the context of rapid spread of digital crime [15], including in the face of threats to information security in the UK after brexit [16]. In the light of development of the digital economy, some suggestions are made to improve the quality of digital forensics, based on the experience and more established practice of other judicial disciplines [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question remains open. G. Horsman notes that, despite the fact that law enforcement agencies are currently combating digital crime, the question still arises as to whether they can maintain this level in the context of rapid spread of digital crime [15], including in the face of threats to information security in the UK after brexit [16]. In the light of development of the digital economy, some suggestions are made to improve the quality of digital forensics, based on the experience and more established practice of other judicial disciplines [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, text, email, or social media messages sent between the complainant and the accused before or after an alleged sexual assault, security camera footage or cellphone photographs/video providing context for an alleged sexual assault, or even cellphone video/photo documentation of the alleged assault occurring each document the context or content of criminal activity (Bluett-Boyd, Fileborn, Quadara, & Moore, 2013; Dodge, 2018; Powell, 2010; Powell & Henry, 2018). Digital evidence, once regarded as existing only in a portion of criminal cases, in our digitized world commonly appears within all crime categories (Arnes, 2018; Horsman, 2017; Scanlan, 2011; Yar, 2013) and—according to our interviewees—is a factor in many (arguably most) cases of sexual assault. The notoriously difficult investigative process for sexual assault cases and the well-documented negative impacts of these investigations on victims (Jordan, 2008; Randall, 2010) warrant a better understanding of the particular potential and pitfalls digital evidence creates for sex crimes investigations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Several analyses outline the need to actively maintain and evaluate digital literacy, as digital skills quickly deteriorate if they are not continuously upheld (Harkin et al, 2018;Horsman, 2017). The DMIs interviewed highlighted a lack of guidance post-training, together with confusion about the duties and the remit of their role.…”
Section: Part-time and Full-time Support Into The Rolementioning
confidence: 99%