2016
DOI: 10.1037/pst0000067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can we collaborate? Mistakes made when group and individual therapists ignore multiple realities.

Abstract: Often, group therapists collaborate with individual therapists in conjoint treatment. Many of these patients start in individual therapy and are referred to the group to help facilitate the treatment and address interpersonal and relational issues that either cannot or will not be addressed in the individual work. Although this has the potential to foster incredible growth for patients, it may also cause problems in treatment when collaboration between therapists falls apart. The current paper will examine mis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first section includes articles that focus on errors rooted in specific clinical and supervision processes, including examining two different decision-making models (Swift, Park, Goode, & Tompkins, 2016), failure to respond to specific clinical markers (Bugatti & Boswell, 2016), interventions outside of the zone of proximal development (TZPD; Stiles, Gabalda, & Ribeiro, 2016), therapist self-disclosure (Ziv-Beiman & Shahar, 2016), responses to client questions (Waehler & Grandy, 2016), feedback measures (Flückiger, Znoj, & Vîslă, 2016; Snyder & Aafjes-van Doorn, 2016), supervision (Zilcha-Mano & Leibovich, 2016), and countertransference (Sharma & Fowler, 2016). The second section includes articles that focus on errors within group psychotherapy, specifically: issues related to group member selection, composition, and supervision (Kealy, Ogrodniczuk, Piper, & Sierra-Hernandez, 2016; Tasca, Mcquaid, & Balfour, 2016) as well as collaboration with individual therapists (Marmarosh, 2016). The third section includes articles that focus on errors related to specific treatments, specifically errors in cognitive–behavior therapy (Olatunji, Kim, & Hollon, 2016) and functional analytic psychotherapy (Tsai, Mandell, Maitland, Kanter, & Kohlenberg, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first section includes articles that focus on errors rooted in specific clinical and supervision processes, including examining two different decision-making models (Swift, Park, Goode, & Tompkins, 2016), failure to respond to specific clinical markers (Bugatti & Boswell, 2016), interventions outside of the zone of proximal development (TZPD; Stiles, Gabalda, & Ribeiro, 2016), therapist self-disclosure (Ziv-Beiman & Shahar, 2016), responses to client questions (Waehler & Grandy, 2016), feedback measures (Flückiger, Znoj, & Vîslă, 2016; Snyder & Aafjes-van Doorn, 2016), supervision (Zilcha-Mano & Leibovich, 2016), and countertransference (Sharma & Fowler, 2016). The second section includes articles that focus on errors within group psychotherapy, specifically: issues related to group member selection, composition, and supervision (Kealy, Ogrodniczuk, Piper, & Sierra-Hernandez, 2016; Tasca, Mcquaid, & Balfour, 2016) as well as collaboration with individual therapists (Marmarosh, 2016). The third section includes articles that focus on errors related to specific treatments, specifically errors in cognitive–behavior therapy (Olatunji, Kim, & Hollon, 2016) and functional analytic psychotherapy (Tsai, Mandell, Maitland, Kanter, & Kohlenberg, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%