2019
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l2320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can we be certain that storage duration of transfused red blood cells does not affect patient outcomes?

Abstract: Large pragmatic randomised trials have found no evidence that the age of red blood cells affects patient survival, but Trivella and colleagues say that problems with their design and analysis leave unanswered questions about safety

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it has been argued that a range of clinical, methodologic, and statistical problems do affect the analysis and interpretation of trial results for RBC storage age, and indeed the levels of reassurance for clinicians may not be that strong. 26 A number of studies have identified variable associations between the storage age of PLT concentrates with laboratory variables and inflammatory adverse events. [7][8][9] In adults, a cohort study of 381 critically ill trauma patients reported that exposure to older apheresis PLT concentrates did not impact mortality or rates of acute respiratory distress syndrome or renal or liver failure, but was independently associated with higher rates of sepsis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it has been argued that a range of clinical, methodologic, and statistical problems do affect the analysis and interpretation of trial results for RBC storage age, and indeed the levels of reassurance for clinicians may not be that strong. 26 A number of studies have identified variable associations between the storage age of PLT concentrates with laboratory variables and inflammatory adverse events. [7][8][9] In adults, a cohort study of 381 critically ill trauma patients reported that exposure to older apheresis PLT concentrates did not impact mortality or rates of acute respiratory distress syndrome or renal or liver failure, but was independently associated with higher rates of sepsis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No such comparable randomized trials exist for PLT storage age. However, it has been argued that a range of clinical, methodologic, and statistical problems do affect the analysis and interpretation of trial results for RBC storage age, and indeed the levels of reassurance for clinicians may not be that strong 26 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Randomized clinical trials in the settings of critically ill adults (23), cardiac surgery (24), and adult hospitalized patients (25), in which subjects were assigned to transfusion of either short duration storage RBCs or prolonged duration stored RBCs, have not demonstrated differences in mortality or secondary outcomes such as length of stay, or transfusion reactions. The generalizability of these trials to the treatment of speci c patients has been questioned on the basis of a number of clinical and methodologic issues, including inconsistency in the de nition of short, standard, and prolonged storage; heterogeneity of case mix; multiple transfusions; and dichotomization of the continuous variable of storage duration (26). Notably, none of these trials utilized any direct measure of RBC unit quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, uncertainties still remain for RBC units at the extremes of storage duration, as it is the biological changes in oldest RBCs that have been of most concern, and for certain populations that may receive multiple RBC units (e.g., massive transfusion) 99. Further RCTs are unlikely to answer this question, and individual patient data metaanalyses of the completed trials are being planned 99. Focus has also shifted towards other factors that may affect RBC quality, such as collection and processing methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%