Can vernacular buildings survive with traditional life inside and tourism outside?

Abstract

Tourism has positive as well as negative effects on the sustainable utilization of traditional vernacular buildings, especially in cultural heritage cities that have become important tourism destinations. Many of these cities improve the accommodation facilities by utilizing traditional vernacular buildings, while consequently meaning that these cultural heritages are in danger of losing their authenticity. On the other hand, tourism development also has positive effects in that it brings in funds that help restore and renovate the buildings which would otherwise face gradual deterioration. This is a dilemma that many historical cities face under tourism development, especially in developing countries. The authors categorize the development approach of cultural heritage tourism into two patterns. One is the "outside-in" approach, which means to dominantly satisfy the tourists' needs while sacrificing the local cultural character. The other approach is the "inside-out" approach, which means that the local community follows its own growth principle, and tourists come in mostly to enjoy and to learn from the local wisdom. We examine the two approaches by taking the current status of protected buildings in Lijiang city as a case study. In this famous Chinese world heritage city, some 140 important vernacular buildings face serious pressure of tourism oriented transformation both in form and in usage. We investigate the buildings and find they have changed their usage dramatically, accompanied with relevant changes in form, layout, and decoration styles. We further review the policy system and find that these changes in vernacular buildings are due to lack of proper standing in conservation policy system, lack of sufficient financial aid, and lack of full technical support.

Physical Changes in World Heritage Sites under the Pressure of Tourism: The Case of Cumalıkızık Village in Bursa

“…The sustainable tourism for cultural heritage areas means the sustainability of not only physical environment but also lifestyle. For the sustainable use of traditional structures, harmonious use has an important role (Zhang, Yamamura & Fujiki, 2006).…”

Understanding Impacts of Cultural Tourism on Sustainability of Rural Architecture in Three Villages of Bursa

“…Different forms of touristic activities improve the use of local landscape by the villagers and provide accessibility to the rural heritage by the visitors. According to 'the inside-out approach' (Zhang et al, 2006), the local community could follow its growth principle while tourists come in mostly to enjoy and to learn from the local wisdom.…”

“…The increasing awareness of tourists, gathering information for higher quality travels, has created a desire to get to know the culture, lifestyle and traditions of the hosting places, mostly the historical villages. Rural tourism 1 is recently popular among the researchers for energy efficiency and ecological sustainability (Zhang et al 2006;Aslam et al 2015;Lane et al 2015). Since mass tourism results in environmental degradation in villages, rural tourism is an alternative for gathering benefits for their socioeconomic and infrastructural development.…”

Tourism policy and residents' well-being in Cyprus: Opportunities and challenges for developing an inside-out destination management approach

“…However, in an effort to please tourists' demands it has been noted that many resources (i.e., cultural character) are sacrificed. This 'outside-in' approach is quite evident in contemporary tourism (Zhang, Yamamura & Fujiki, 2013). Furthermore, Sofield (2003) argues that while public involvement in tourism planning is noted, it presupposes that their (re)action about tourism will be positive and eventually, it is questionable if their contribution is really active towards their own benefit.…”