2004
DOI: 10.1063/1.1824151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can turbophoresis be predicted by large-eddy simulation?

Abstract: Direct numerical simulation (DNS) and large-eddy simulation (LES) of particle-laden turbulent channel flow, in which the particles experience a drag force, are performed. In this flow turbophoresis leads to an accumulation of particles near the walls. It is shown that the turbophoresis in LES is reduced, in case the subgrid effects in the particle equations of motion are ignored. To alleviate this problem an inverse filtering model is proposed and incorporated into the particle equations. The model is shown to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
94
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(17 reference statements)
4
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has often been successful provided that a dissipation term is added to control the extra fluctuations introduced by defiltering. Recently, Kuerten and Vreman 14,15 and later Shotorban and Maskayek 17 showed that defiltering of the fluid velocity also yields a useful subgrid model in the particle equation of motion.…”
Section: B Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has often been successful provided that a dissipation term is added to control the extra fluctuations introduced by defiltering. Recently, Kuerten and Vreman 14,15 and later Shotorban and Maskayek 17 showed that defiltering of the fluid velocity also yields a useful subgrid model in the particle equation of motion.…”
Section: B Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results depend on the subgrid model applied, but even for an "optimal" subgrid model, a substantial difference between the DNS and LES results remains, especially for particle relaxation times of the same order as the Kolmogorov time. It has also been shown 14,15 that results improve if a defiltered fluid velocity 16 is used in the particle equation of motion, and if an adequate subgrid model, such as the dynamic eddyviscosity model, 6 is applied. Later, a similar deconvolution model was proposed as a subgrid model in the particle equation by Shotorban and Mashayek,17 who applied this procedure in LES of particle-laden homogeneous shear flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ray & Collins (2011) demonstrated that a simple rescaling of the Stokes numbers based on the timescales of the resolved velocity could not reproduce the Lagrangian statistics of the particle motions because there is nonlinear coupling between the particle velocities and positions. The approximate deconvolution method could recover the one-particle statistics and, to some extent, improve the prediction of two-particle statistics with separations approximately equal to the grid resolution (Kuerten & Vreman 2005, Kuerten 2006, Shotorban et al 2007). In particular, the dynamic approximate deconvolution method based on elliptic differential filters could better predict the statistics of the preferential concentrations (Park et al 2015).…”
Section: Fdns Filtered Direct Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deconvolution approach can partially recover the unsolved velocity fields. Recently, Kuerten and Verman (2005) and Shotorban and Mashayek (2006) have developed a stochastic Lagrangian particle model to better represent Lagrangian statistics of inertial particles. Fede and Simonin (2006) found that the particle accumulation and collision rate are significantly influenced by the SGS velocity fluctuations when the particle response time is of the same order or smaller than the subgrid Lagrangian integral time scale measured along particle path.…”
Section: Point-particle Based Lesmentioning
confidence: 99%