2011
DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2011.545713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Traditional Divergent Thinking Tests Be Trusted in Measuring and Predicting Real-World Creativity?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
144
0
10

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 237 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
144
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…As the score is based on frequency of the answers, it can be considered a measure of verbal fluency, not necessarily of creativity (Silvia et al, 2008). Overall, divergent thinking tasks measure only a very limited aspect of creativity, and therefore their relevance in education has been questioned (Barbot, Besancon, & Lubart, 2015;Zeng, Proctor, & Salvendy, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the score is based on frequency of the answers, it can be considered a measure of verbal fluency, not necessarily of creativity (Silvia et al, 2008). Overall, divergent thinking tasks measure only a very limited aspect of creativity, and therefore their relevance in education has been questioned (Barbot, Besancon, & Lubart, 2015;Zeng, Proctor, & Salvendy, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, creativity is a necessary ingredient in learning processes when these require us to handle situations, tasks and practices in new ways. In this sense, the results of creativity are not only to be judged by assessing signs of divergent thinking as most psychological treatments of the phenomena tends to do (Zeng et al, 2011;Tanggaard, 2013). Creativity involves changes and transformations of people and social practices, hopefully for the better.…”
Section: Theoretical Departurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…2011 ;Plucker, Beghetto, & Dow, 2004;Zeng et al, 2011). In addition, these instruments are often used separately, and each instrument has its specific limitations (Horn & Salvendy, 2006;Kaufman et al, 2007;Lemons, 2011).…”
Section: Domain-generality/ Specificity Of Creativitymentioning
confidence: 99%