Can Traditional Chinese Medicine Diagnosis Be Parameterized and Standardized? A Narrative Review

Abstract

The integration of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) in Western health systems and research requires a rational communicable theory, scientific proof of efficacy and safety, and quality control measures. The existence of clear definitions and the diagnosis standardization are critical factors to establish the patient’s vegetative functional status accurately and, therefore, systematically apply TCM therapeutics such as the stimulation of reflex skin areas known as acupoints. This science-based conceptualization entails using validated methods, or even developing new systems able to parameterize the diagnosis and assess TCM related effects by objective measurements. Traditionally, tongue and pulse diagnosis and the functional evaluation of action points by pressure sensitivity and physical examination may be regarded as essential diagnostic tools. Parameterizing these techniques is a future key point in the objectification of TCM diagnosis, such as by electronic digital image analysis, mechanical pulse diagnostic systems, or the systematic evaluation of acupoints’ electrophysiology. This review aims to demonstrate and critically analyze some achievements and limitations in the clinical application of device-assisted TCM diagnosis systems to evaluate functional physiological patterns. Despite some limitations, tongue, pulse, and electrophysiological diagnosis devices have been reported as a useful tool while establishing a person’s functional status.

Understanding Traditional Chinese Medicine Therapeutics: An Overview of the Basics and Clinical Applications

“…This process requires measuring a wide range of variables in a representative sample and statistical procedures to validate the findings. As shown in a previous review, this can also lead to new technological systems to measure TCM-related effects, and to calibrate and mimic complex and skillful diagnosis procedures [211]. A second crucial factor is the further development of experimental approaches in TCM research, such as the double-blinding of acupuncture trials [120,[134][135][136][137] and the development of a placebo for "Qigong" research [212].…”

Perceptions of traditional Chinese medicine doctors about using wearable devices and traditional Chinese medicine diagnostic instruments: A mixed-methodology study

“…The correct interpretation of the results of TCM diagnoses can help TCM doctors become more efficient. 47 , 48 Existing wearable devices and TCM diagnostic devices lack explanations and data to support the diagnostic results, and TCM doctors expect them.…”

Perspectives, Measurability and Effects of Non-Contact Biofield-Based Practices: A Narrative Review of Quantitative Research

“…Are these results due to the biofield practice itself or due to the practitioner’s experience and particular abilities? Here, a parameterization effort similar to the one seen in TCM diagnosis and practices [ 167 ] is imperative to “calibrate” the healers and healing process. Recently, Connor et al [ 168 ] reported a set of portable and cost-effective measures that scientists could use to determine the competence of “energy practitioners” so that qualified practitioners could be selected to improve research accuracy.…”