This study centers on developing a structure and forum for novice teachers to explore science education reform documents and to link them to practice. To date, science education reform efforts have focused mainly on intended curricula (goals, standards, frameworks, etc.) and outcome-based measures (assessments). The implemented curriculum-the way teachers plan to teach-has received less attention. Moreover, the literature indicates that the gap between reform goals and practice can be attributed to the lack of attention to the implemented curriculum. In this project, 25 preservice and recently inducted science teachers analyzed the materials of Project 2061 or the National Research Council standards. A series of structured and interconnected activities allowed them to create summaries and an evaluation instrument, teachers' criteria, parallel to reform goals. Teams developed 10-day teaching units based on reform principles, then analyzed the products using the criteria they had developed. The study suggests some methods to help new teachers understand science education reform and create products that can be used for planning, teaching, and evaluation. J Res Sci Teach 34: 3-17, 1997.
The task of philosophy is to make what is evident, evident. (Aristotle)Reformers have the idea that change can be achieved by brute sanity. (George Bernard Shaw) National agendas, such as Project 2061, Scope Sequence and Coordination, were not touching my daily life. I knew about them, had worked on some, and then like my students, dismissed them. Good people were trying to create a new world of science literacy but they were not viable options in my teaching life because they were not grounded in any relevancy for my students and me. Our voices were silent in this process, as my students' voices used to be silent in my classroom. Connections and conversations were not happening enough to sustain enough interest on my part. I was searching now, not later . . . (Hiller, 1995, p. 64) The author of the above quote is an in-service science teacher who writes from the trenches. She was impatient for science education reform, meaningful and relevant, to come to her school. She is not alone. A recent article in The Washington Post reported that a bipartisan fed-JOURNAL