2014
DOI: 10.1557/opl.2014.952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can the Wet – State Conductivity of Hydrogels be Improved by Incorporation of Spherical Conducting Nanoparticles?

Abstract: In nerve and muscle regeneration applications, the incorporation of conducting elements into biocompatible materials has gained interest over the last few years, as it has been shown that electrical stimulation of some regenerating cells has a positive effect on their development. A variety of different materials, ranging from graphene to conducting polymers, have been incorporated into hydrogels and increased conductivities have been reported. However, the majority of conductivity measurements are performed i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The drop of conductivity for 0.4 m PPy might be a result from electrolyte being expelled and replaced by the PPy:PSS matrix in the ADA‐GEL hydrogel, leading to a significant decrease in overall ionic conductivity (Figure 3D) and ion mobility, overall influencing the electrical performance of the composite. [ 87 ] Others have demonstrated a similar drop of both electrical conductivity and stiffness for high PPy‐content (100 m m Py, in situ oxidized) hyaluronic acid hydrogels, [ 82 ] which was associated to structural instability and non‐uniformity of the final PPy hydrogel. [ 82 ] Consistent with these results, 0.4 m PPy showed similarly decreased electrical conductivity and elastic modulus, suggesting that this modification is not feasible for further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The drop of conductivity for 0.4 m PPy might be a result from electrolyte being expelled and replaced by the PPy:PSS matrix in the ADA‐GEL hydrogel, leading to a significant decrease in overall ionic conductivity (Figure 3D) and ion mobility, overall influencing the electrical performance of the composite. [ 87 ] Others have demonstrated a similar drop of both electrical conductivity and stiffness for high PPy‐content (100 m m Py, in situ oxidized) hyaluronic acid hydrogels, [ 82 ] which was associated to structural instability and non‐uniformity of the final PPy hydrogel. [ 82 ] Consistent with these results, 0.4 m PPy showed similarly decreased electrical conductivity and elastic modulus, suggesting that this modification is not feasible for further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have identified that incorporation of spherical conductive PPy nanoparticle fillers inside ALG hydrogels does not increase but slightly decreases the electrical hydrogel conductivity until forming a percolating PPy network. [87] An increased PPy formation in the ADA-GEL network repels water content from the overall hydrogel volume, due to the higher ratio of Py to PSS, and therefore, lowering of the amount of free sulfonates to interact with water. The ionic conductivity of the electrolyte-swollen hydrogel (≈1 S m −1 , Figure 3), which is close to the range of culture medium (≈1.5 S m −1 [88][89][90] at 37°C), has a non-neglectable contribution to the overall hydrogel conductivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%