2020
DOI: 10.1017/rdc.2020.58
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CAN THE14C PRODUCTION IN 1055 CE BE AFFECTED BY SN1054?

Abstract: Annually resolved radiocarbon (14C) measurements on tree rings led to the discovery of abrupt variations in 14C production attributed to large solar flares. We present new results of annual and subannual 14C fluctuations in tree rings from a middle-latitude sequoia (California) and a high-latitude pine (Finland), analyzed for the period 1030–1080 CE, to trace a possible impact of the Crab supernova explosion, occurring during the Oort minimum of solar activity. Our results indicate an increase of Δ14C around 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the 14 C increases in 1528 BCE and 1279 CE were each reported by only one tree and location (Brehm et al., 2021 ; Pearson et al., 2020 ). The 14 C increase around 1055 CE was suggested as a different 14 C variation from the SEP‐driven events and having a possible link with the supernova SN 1054 (Terrasi et al., 2020 ). Therefore, detailed verifications using multiple trees and multi‐nuclides will be needed to confirm the occurrence and the origin of these newly registered events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the 14 C increases in 1528 BCE and 1279 CE were each reported by only one tree and location (Brehm et al., 2021 ; Pearson et al., 2020 ). The 14 C increase around 1055 CE was suggested as a different 14 C variation from the SEP‐driven events and having a possible link with the supernova SN 1054 (Terrasi et al., 2020 ). Therefore, detailed verifications using multiple trees and multi‐nuclides will be needed to confirm the occurrence and the origin of these newly registered events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the date, if not the presence, of the 3372/3371 BCE event should be noted as controversial up to now. Also, rapid 14 C increases have been reported in 1528 BCE (Pearson et al, 2020), ∼1055 CE (Brehm et al, 2021;Eastoe et al, 2019;Terrasi et al, 2020), and 1279 CE (Brehm et al, 2021). However, the 14 C increases in 1528 BCE and 1279 CE were each reported by only one tree and location (Brehm et al, 2021;Pearson et al, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We evaluate the temporal coherence of five 14 C series with 1052 CE/1054 CE signatures developed independently and published by Eastoe et al (2019), Terrasi et al (2020), andBrehm et al (2021b) (Figure 1a). The tree rings are originated from four locations (Figure 1b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent investigation of the effect of the Crab Nebula supernova (SN1054) in the annual rate of 14 C production found a Δ 14 C excursion at 1054/55 CE of 4‰ at tree-ring archives from Sierra Nevada Mountains and Finnish Lapland (Terrasi et al 2020). However, other studies of tree rings from Central England and another location in the Sierra Nevada Mountains (California) report much higher 14 C ranges for this time interval (up to 6‰) but in 1053 CE, one year prior to the SN1054 visible light arrival to the Earth atmosphere, and attribute it to a possible SEP event (Eastoe et al 2019;Brehm et al 2021b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation