Can the Safe Surgical Margin Be Narrowed in Early-Stage Facial Basal Cell Carcinoma?

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To examine factors that affect the positive surgical margins of facial basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and investigate whether the surgical margin value can be narrowed in early-stage facial BCCs. METHODS Ninety-five patients were divided into the three groups based on prognosis: good (n = 48), mixed (n = 32), and poor (n = 15). The good prognosis group (group 1) included nodular and superficial subtypes; the mixed prognosis group (group 2) included nodular-infiltrative, nodular-micronodular, and nodular-sclerosing subtypes; and the poor prognosis group (group 3) included infiltrative and micronodular subtypes. RESULTS Groups 1 and 2 differed from each other significantly in terms of positive surgical margin (P = .002) and tumor thickness (P = .008), but group 3 did not (P = .851 and P = .804, respectively). With regard to surgical method (primary vs local flap repair), only tumor localization varied significantly (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Groups differed significantly in terms of surgical margin positivity, the distance of the tumor to the surgical margin, and the tumor thickness. The intact surgical margin was 2 mm on average in this study, and the authors suggest that it may be possible to revise the surgical margin values recommended in the literature.