2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2020.02.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can the prehospital National Early Warning Score 2 identify patients at risk of in-hospital early mortality? A prospective, multicenter cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 is based on a hospital assessed cohort -QCovid36 does not incorporate acute variables so will underestimate severity in sick patients who lack known risk factors -NEWS237 is not covid-19 specific and the score may change only at a late stage of deterioration…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 is based on a hospital assessed cohort -QCovid36 does not incorporate acute variables so will underestimate severity in sick patients who lack known risk factors -NEWS237 is not covid-19 specific and the score may change only at a late stage of deterioration…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To standardize initial and serial assessments of patients' clinical status, the NEWS2 scale (the latest version of the National Early Warning Score) was used. NEWS2 scores were based on assessment of six physiological indices: respiratory rate; oxygen saturation; systolic blood pressure; heart rate; level of consciousness; and temperature [ 8 , 9 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NEWS assigns a score to f R values outside of the 12-20 breaths/min range, with the highest score attributed to f R values ≤8 and ≥25 breaths/min [112], while the highest score for MEWS is attributed to f R values ≥30 breaths/min [113]. A modified version of NEWS (i.e., NEWS2) has shown a good predictive capacity for the identification of in-hospital early mortality (all-cause) even when vital signs were collected at pre-hospital level, with f R showing lower values in survivors compared to non-survivors [114]. f R is also among the signs used for sepsis identification [115][116][117].…”
Section: Current Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%