2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2010.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can the internet reduce corruption? A cross-country study based on dynamic panel data models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
69
0
10

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
7
69
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…It means that increase in accountability, administration via online access of information regarding government data and agencies, reduces the inaccuracies and risk which provide transparent and symmetric information to all the citizens where no power can be exercised to rig the private gain through malpractices, bribery, extortion, improper political contribution and abuse of discretion. Hence, improvement in e-government combat corruption (increases control of corruption) and estimated results are consistent with the studies of Klitgaard (1988), Lio, et al, (2011), UNDP (2008 and Goel at al., (2012). The econometric results depict that on the average increase in e-government increases the economic prosperity by 3.2 percent that is significant at 1 percent and shows 0.54 percent variations in economic prosperity due to change in e-government.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Interpretationsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It means that increase in accountability, administration via online access of information regarding government data and agencies, reduces the inaccuracies and risk which provide transparent and symmetric information to all the citizens where no power can be exercised to rig the private gain through malpractices, bribery, extortion, improper political contribution and abuse of discretion. Hence, improvement in e-government combat corruption (increases control of corruption) and estimated results are consistent with the studies of Klitgaard (1988), Lio, et al, (2011), UNDP (2008 and Goel at al., (2012). The econometric results depict that on the average increase in e-government increases the economic prosperity by 3.2 percent that is significant at 1 percent and shows 0.54 percent variations in economic prosperity due to change in e-government.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Interpretationsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Environmental degradation can be reduced by improving egovernment maturity. The estimated results are steady with the studies of Klitgaard (1988), Lio, et al, (2011.…”
Section: Syeda Anam Hassan Investigating the Relationship Of E-governsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Telecommunications infrastructure impacts institutional quality in various ways. For example, Internet adoption has been found to have a positive impact on corruption reduction (Lio, Liu, & Ou, 2011;Shim & Eom, 2008). Shirazi (2008) showed that ICT infrastructure had a net positive impact on democracy and freedom of expression, which could enhance government accountability and hence institutional quality.…”
Section: Ict Infrastructure (Telecommunications)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corruption in public procurement is increasing especially in developing countries as evidenced by reports of the World Bank, the United Nations (UN), Transparency International, and the Asian Development Bank (ADB) reports. Corruption can hinder the development of country by weakening national institutions, increasing business costs, eroding trust, and discouraging external investment (Lio, Liu and Ou (2011). Raymond (2008) argued that corruption is a serious problem for developing countries that actively hinders their progress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%