2020
DOI: 10.1111/jan.14303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme check‐lists be used alongside Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation to improve transparency and decision‐making?

Abstract: Aims The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group Guidance is widely used to increase the transparency by which evidence is turned into recommendations. Although the process is clearly defined, it may be difficult to use in nursing education and practice because it uses separate terminology and tools to those sometimes used in education, such as those devised by the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). This paper aims to show how these tools can be used tog… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, to meet the aims of the review, a sufficiency of the reporting approach was undertaken using an amended version of the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) critical appraisal tools designed for multiple research study designs. 27 The items included: Aim (was there a clear statement of the aims of the research?) Setting (was it clear where the development of the intervention took place?)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to meet the aims of the review, a sufficiency of the reporting approach was undertaken using an amended version of the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) critical appraisal tools designed for multiple research study designs. 27 The items included: Aim (was there a clear statement of the aims of the research?) Setting (was it clear where the development of the intervention took place?)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To that end, the keywords “benefits,” “simulation,” and “hospital emergency department” were searched in different databases to find relevant articles. The PRISMA statement[ 14 ] was used to report the total 349 articles which were found in ProQuest (51), Web of Science (49), Scopus (40), PubMed (110), Google Scholar (50) Iranian databases of medical research: including SID, Magiran, Irandoc, and Civilica, (115) and those other scientific databases were excluded because of overlap with the selected databases mentioned above in terms of the related papers or due to having few relevant articles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the scores of each criterion are added together to calculate the final score of each article out of 50. Any article with a score above 30 deserves to be selected as the final article for analysis (Purssell, 2020). Using CASP, we eliminated 56 articles and chose 83 articles as the final selected ones for review.…”
Section: Phase 3 Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%