2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00106-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can tailored interventions increase mammography use among HMO women?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
69
1
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
69
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Stoddard and colleagues (2002), a woman's mammography adherence is regular "if she reported a mammogram within 24 months of the survey and a prior mammogram within 24 months of the most recent mammogram" and recent "if she had had a mammogram within 24 months of the survey but had not had a prior mammogram within 24 months of the most recent." This classification is used by the Breast Cancer Screening Consortium Anderson et al, 2000;Costanza et al, 2000;Lipkus et al, 2000;Messina et al, 2002;Stockdale et al, 2000), but not by others (Rakowski et al, 2003). Despite this variation, we hypothesize that repeat/regular mammography is a more stringent outcome than recent mammography, that will result in lower effect sizes.…”
Section: Variability In Outcome Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Stoddard and colleagues (2002), a woman's mammography adherence is regular "if she reported a mammogram within 24 months of the survey and a prior mammogram within 24 months of the most recent mammogram" and recent "if she had had a mammogram within 24 months of the survey but had not had a prior mammogram within 24 months of the most recent." This classification is used by the Breast Cancer Screening Consortium Anderson et al, 2000;Costanza et al, 2000;Lipkus et al, 2000;Messina et al, 2002;Stockdale et al, 2000), but not by others (Rakowski et al, 2003). Despite this variation, we hypothesize that repeat/regular mammography is a more stringent outcome than recent mammography, that will result in lower effect sizes.…”
Section: Variability In Outcome Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The treatment received by the control group-Some studies compare the outcome of an intervention to a no-treatment control, while others use an active control, such as nontailored information or a reminder phone call (Lipkus et al, 2000;. We hypothesize that there will be a larger effect size when interventions are compared to a no treatment control than to an active control.…”
Section: Intervention Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results of several studies suggest that tailoring interventions to both HBM constructs and stage of mammography adoption (based on TTM) enhances intervention effectiveness leading to increased mammography use [14,17,[23][24][25][26]. Further, there is some evidence that combining tailored telephone and print interventions are more effective than print along.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This framework has also been applied to minority groups, specifically African American and Hispanic women [32,[36][37][38][39][40][41]. Tailored intervention using stage-matched materials have been shown to improve mammography use [34,35,37,42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%