2000
DOI: 10.5153/sro.486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can't Talk, Won't Talk?: Methodological Issues in Researching Children

Abstract: In this paper we explore some current issues in, what has come to be called, the new sociology of childhood and how these relate to the process of researching children's lives in general, and to our own research in particular. We discuss the developmental model of childhood, before going on to explore ideas about children as, on the one hand, inhabiting a relatively autonomous realm and, on the other as part of the same social world as adults but with different sets of competencies. The implications of these d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
108
0
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
108
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this raises a further ethical issue; although informed consent was obtained from parents / guardians, teachers, parents and children, with participants proffered the opportunity to withdraw at all points of contact, consent was not obtained from those pictured in the photographs. Participation in analysis may be questioned as without academic analysts, research may produce nothing more than lay understandings (Harden et al, 2000). However, as in this case, if the aim is to give children a voice and to gain their perspective in order to contribute to adults' understanding of child well being, it would appear necessary that children undertake the analysis to reduce the imposition of an adults' view through the adult analyst's interpretation of the data.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, this raises a further ethical issue; although informed consent was obtained from parents / guardians, teachers, parents and children, with participants proffered the opportunity to withdraw at all points of contact, consent was not obtained from those pictured in the photographs. Participation in analysis may be questioned as without academic analysts, research may produce nothing more than lay understandings (Harden et al, 2000). However, as in this case, if the aim is to give children a voice and to gain their perspective in order to contribute to adults' understanding of child well being, it would appear necessary that children undertake the analysis to reduce the imposition of an adults' view through the adult analyst's interpretation of the data.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the research process through which this perspective is accessed can be problematic as, Harden et al, (2000) argue, it reinforces inequalities in power between adults and children. This can be negated to some extent by the active and meaningful participation of children throughout the research process (Darbyshire et al, 2005), including the analysis stage where power differentials are particularly manifested (Mayall, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…How can we access children's perspectives and lived experience? One avenue suggested is to use a range of methods to take account of diversity between children (see, for example, Christensen and James 2000) or to involve children as actors in research as a way to overcome the power imbalance between the child and the researcher (Alderson 2000, Mason and Hood 2011) which, however, might create new methodological problems (Harden et al 2000). On the other hand, whether research with children is necessarily different from research with adults is also being questioned.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This visual representation was used to compare children's sibships with other important relationships in their lives, such as their friends or parents. Some children appeared at ease and confident with straightforward talking (Harden et al, 2000), whereas others seemed to prefer the visual task-based activities. However, to avoid making incorrect, possibly 'adultist' assumptions, I offered them the choice of whether they preferred to talk, write or draw about their social networks.…”
Section: Task-based Interview Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%