2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2005.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Symptom Presentation Predict Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in a Moderate-Risk Cohort?

Abstract: Clinicians should not rely on classic descriptions of angina when evaluating patients suspected of UA/NSTEMI.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4, 6, 7 These two symptoms were also associated with non-ACS when demographics, clinical history and other symptoms were accounted for. This is counterintuitive because one might expect these symptoms as a result of altered cardiac output during acute ischemia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…4, 6, 7 These two symptoms were also associated with non-ACS when demographics, clinical history and other symptoms were accounted for. This is counterintuitive because one might expect these symptoms as a result of altered cardiac output during acute ischemia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“… 6 It was also reported that patients who never experienced chest pain had a 3 times higher risk of death than patients whose chest pain persisted or recurred in the Emergency Department. 7 Therefore, it is important that the physicians make a correct initial diagnosis. An ECG and a cardiac biomarker test are recommended to exclude ACS with atypical presentation in cases with pharyngolaryngeal findings suggesting pharyngeal pain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…atypical chest pain or atypical symptoms/anginal equivalents). [ 16 ] Articles had to be available in English language and full text and published in peer-reviewed journals, and no limiters regarding methodology were used. Limiters of adults (aged >18 years) and publication from the year 2000 were applied; the date limit was selected to coincide with marked changes within the study of ACS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, a better understanding of the varying symptomology of ACS has the potential to advise public health campaigns, inform clinical guidelines, encourage early health-seeking behaviour and support clinicians in their approach and decision-making. [ 16 ] As such, research to identify what the constellation of symptoms suggestive of myocardial ischaemia are is vital. Hence, the aims of this scoping review were to systematically investigate and collate: definitions of presentations other than cardiac chest pain in ACS patients; atypical chest pain and anginal equivalent symptoms reported and their proportions; risk factors in presentations without cardiac chest pain; and lastly, outcomes for ACS patients presenting without cardiac chest pain and comparing those with patients experiencing cardiac chest pain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%