2017
DOI: 10.3414/me16-01-0084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Statistical Machine Learning Algorithms Help for Classification of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Severity to Optimal Utilization of Polysomno graphy Resources?

Abstract: Study results showed that machine learning methods can be used to estimate the probabilities of no, mild, moderate, and severe obstructive sleep apnea and such approaches may improve accurate initial OSA screening and help referring only the suspected moderate or severe OSA patients to sleep laboratories for the expensive tests.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They established SVM and RF OSA grading prediction models, achieving low performance with an AUC of 65, a sensitivity of 44.7, and an accuracy of 39.9 for SVM and an AUC of 63.7, a sensitivity of 44.1, and an accuracy of 44.1 for RF. Similarly, Bozkurt et al ( 2017 ) employed clinical data, including age, sex, BMI, neck circumference, smoking status, clinical symptoms, and physical examination, to build LR and RF four-category classification prediction models. The AUC for LR and RF was reported as 0.84 and 0.81, respectively, slightly outperforming the models established in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They established SVM and RF OSA grading prediction models, achieving low performance with an AUC of 65, a sensitivity of 44.7, and an accuracy of 39.9 for SVM and an AUC of 63.7, a sensitivity of 44.1, and an accuracy of 44.1 for RF. Similarly, Bozkurt et al ( 2017 ) employed clinical data, including age, sex, BMI, neck circumference, smoking status, clinical symptoms, and physical examination, to build LR and RF four-category classification prediction models. The AUC for LR and RF was reported as 0.84 and 0.81, respectively, slightly outperforming the models established in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, PSG has the disadvantages of being laborious, time-consuming, and expensive. Therefore, many studies have been conducted to develop methods for screening OSAS without performing PSG, and the application of machine learning techniques has also been widely used 33 37 . In recent years, researches on the South Korean population have also been actively conducted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, a number of metrics for classification performance are calculated and evaluated, so the researcher can assess the accuracy of the predictive model. Recently, these methods are becoming more popular to help predict OSA diagnosis and severity using different types of clinical and anthropometric features (Liu et al 2017, Bozkurt et al 2017, Lee et al 2009). An important issue when applying supervised machine learning methods is the balance between accuracy (i.e.…”
Section: Novel Analytical Approaches Of Physiological Signals To Idenmentioning
confidence: 99%