2014
DOI: 10.1063/1.4890568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can spurious indications for phase synchronization due to superimposed signals be avoided?

Abstract: We investigate the relative merit of phase-based methods-mean phase coherence, unweighted and weighted phase lag index-for estimating the strength of interactions between dynamical systems from empirical time series which are affected by common sources and noise. By numerically analyzing the interaction dynamics of coupled model systems, we compare these methods to each other with respect to their ability to distinguish between different levels of coupling for various simulated experimental situations. We comp… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
2
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, functional connectivity was estimated using the phase lag index (PLI), which measures the asymmetry in the distribution of instantaneous phase differences between two time series. It ranges between zero (flat distribution due to noise or no connectivity, or a phase difference of zero modulus pi due to volume conduction) and one (full synchronization), and is robust against the effects of volume conduction and field spread . Using the PLI, the minimum spanning tree (MST) was constructed, which forms the backbone of the original network, where the ROIs served as nodes and the inverted PLI values (1/PLI) as edge weights.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, functional connectivity was estimated using the phase lag index (PLI), which measures the asymmetry in the distribution of instantaneous phase differences between two time series. It ranges between zero (flat distribution due to noise or no connectivity, or a phase difference of zero modulus pi due to volume conduction) and one (full synchronization), and is robust against the effects of volume conduction and field spread . Using the PLI, the minimum spanning tree (MST) was constructed, which forms the backbone of the original network, where the ROIs served as nodes and the inverted PLI values (1/PLI) as edge weights.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It ranges between zero (flat distribution due to noise or no connectivity, or a phase difference of zero modulus pi due to volume conduction) and one (full synchronization), and is robust against the effects of volume conduction and field spread. 39 Using the PLI, the minimum spanning tree (MST) was constructed, which forms the backbone of the original network, where the ROIs served as nodes and the inverted PLI values (1/PLI) as edge weights. The MST is formed by starting with an empty network, and by subsequently adding the edges with the smallest weights (i.e., with the highest PLI), until all nodes in the network are connected, while discarding edges that form loops.…”
Section: Functional Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of the PLI is that it is less likely to be contaminated by volume conduction (Porz et al, 2014; Stam et al, 2007). The PLI ranges between 0 (no phase synchronization) and 1 (complete phase synchronization).…”
Section: Graph Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, by analysing both functional brain networks (the “true” one derived from PLI and the one derived from PLV, which may be affected by volume conduction effects, but includes all type of connections), we can be sure to gather most of the information available from our data in the form of functional connectivity patterns. Indeed, recent results comparing the application of PLV to PS indices robust to volume conduction, clearly suggest [96, 97] that PLV may provide additional information not present in other indices, whereas the use of advanced pre-processing methods such as the Laplacian to work with current source densities instead of voltages does not solve the volume conduction problem either [98]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%