2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10368-020-00490-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can South America form an optimal monetary area? A structural vector autoregression analysis

Abstract: This research analyzes the feasibility of adopting a common currency in South America using the Optimal Monetary Areas theory. Taking into account that the relative dominance of regional shocks in local output is considered a key indicator to adopt a regional currency, we use a structural vector autoregression (SVAR) model to determine what type of shock —among global, regional or country specific— prevails in South American economies. The results of variance decomposition demonstrate that the output trajector… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the OCA theory emphasizes that the benefits of adopting a common currency are directly proportional to the level of intraregional trade; and if business cycles of the members of a monetary area are synchronized, the cost of losing the monetary policy is lower, as it is possible to use a common monetary policy. Following De Grauwe and Mongelli (2005), and Padilla and Rodríguez García-Brazales (2021), Figures 7 and 8 represent the relationship between the potential costs and benefits of adopting dollarization for each region. The costs are represented by the decomposition of variance for the prediction error of the GS obtained from the BM model and the benefits by the percentage of exports from each country to the US.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the OCA theory emphasizes that the benefits of adopting a common currency are directly proportional to the level of intraregional trade; and if business cycles of the members of a monetary area are synchronized, the cost of losing the monetary policy is lower, as it is possible to use a common monetary policy. Following De Grauwe and Mongelli (2005), and Padilla and Rodríguez García-Brazales (2021), Figures 7 and 8 represent the relationship between the potential costs and benefits of adopting dollarization for each region. The costs are represented by the decomposition of variance for the prediction error of the GS obtained from the BM model and the benefits by the percentage of exports from each country to the US.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hafner and Kampe (2018) found that the countries belonging to the CAN present better homogeneity (in terms of openness and factor mobility) compared to MERCOSUR countries. In the same vein, Padilla and Rodriguez García-Brazales (2021) demonstrate that SA as a whole is not considered not an optimal monetary area. Nevertheless, the researchers identified a group of countries (comprised of Chile, Peru, Ecuador, Brazil, and Argentina) for which the costs of a hypothetical monetary union would be relatively lower.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Recent applications address the OCA theory in terms of the degree of (a)symmetry of macroeconomic disturbances among potential participants. This scheme is relevant insofar as giving up an independent monetary policy to tackle macroeconomic imbalances is less costly if the candidate countries face similar shocks (Padilla & Rodríguez, 2021). Indeed, highly asymmetric shocks imply a floating exchange rate might play the corrective role of shock absorber; otherwise, the exchange rate might lead to critical macroeconomic costs (Hochreiter et al, 2003), say, large fluctuations in production and output due to the disagreement on the interest rate-setting (Staehr, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, participating countries experience lower transaction costs, reduced uncertainty, and increased policy confidence (Zhao & Kim, 2009). On the other hand, the main challenge stems from the inability to invoke independent monetary policy, which may disproportionately harm members in terms of macroeconomic stability when asymmetric aggregate disturbances prevail (Padilla & Rodríguez, 2021). To the best knowledge of the authors, no previous work has explicitly addressed this issue for the CAPADR region by using an empirical background.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%