2019
DOI: 10.1111/ecpo.12143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can social spending cushion the inequality effect of globalization?

Abstract: This paper examines whether social spending cushions the effect of globalization on within‐country inequality. Using information on disposable and market income inequality and data on overall social spending, and health and education spending from the ILO and the World Bank/WHO, we analyze whether social spending moderates the association between economic globalization and inequality. The results confirm that economic globalization—especially economic flows—associates with higher income inequality, an effect d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(3) We finally the test idea that the effect that globalization has on populism is moderated or cushioned by social spending. Following Bergh et al (2020), who showed that social spending does not moderate the effect of economic globalization on inequality, we do so by entering the interaction between globalization and social spending (full results in the online appendix). The interaction effect is close to 0 and far from significant, suggesting that globalization is unrelated to populism regardless of the level of social spending.…”
Section: Mechanisms and Moderatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) We finally the test idea that the effect that globalization has on populism is moderated or cushioned by social spending. Following Bergh et al (2020), who showed that social spending does not moderate the effect of economic globalization on inequality, we do so by entering the interaction between globalization and social spending (full results in the online appendix). The interaction effect is close to 0 and far from significant, suggesting that globalization is unrelated to populism regardless of the level of social spending.…”
Section: Mechanisms and Moderatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a version of a "growth incidence curve" (GIC), as defined in formal terms for continuous distributions by Ravallion and Chen (2003), who discuss the curve's properties. 5 The methodology used to construct 5 Note that the version of the GIC in Lakner and Milanovic (2016a) gives growth rates for ventiles (with the top 1 percent separated out) rather than percentiles. This smooths their curve.…”
Section: The Evidence On Global Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42 See Ravallion and Lokshin (2008), who derive this decomposition and also implement it in the context of studying trade reform in Morocco, and find that the horizontal impacts dominate the vertical impacts for some reforms. 43 A method for addressing this issue and supportive evidence for two countries (Morocco and Vietnam) can be 5. Should We Care, and Why?…”
Section: Measures Of Inequality and Their Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers note that «sustainable development should also consider equity, irreversibility, as well as uncertainty, risk, and the processes of learning associated technological change and environmental vulnerability» (Zilberman, Gordon, Hochman, & Wesseler, 2018). At the same time, as noted in other studies, globalization also affects the welfare of the population, which forms the basis of economic security in modern society (Bergh, Mirkina, & Nilsson, 2019). Issues of economic development and welfare of the population have become more complicated by the development of new technologies (Cooper, McLaren, Rehman, & Szewezyk, 2015).…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 96%