2006
DOI: 10.1080/14768320500102277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can social desirability interfere with success in a behavioral weight loss program?

Abstract: Social desirability is an individual difference characteristic that extends beyond biased responding to questionnaires. Social desirability has the potential to negatively impact treatment outcome including weight loss. This study examines the association between social desirability and percent body weight loss in thirty-six obese participants completing a behavioral weight loss program (BWLP). At baseline, higher social desirability was associated with: (1) greater reported weight control competence and weigh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
2
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
10
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the average number of lapses recorded in the current study (M = 5.97, SD = .41) was considerably higher than that of other weight-related research (M = 2.7, SD = 1.9 [10], M = 1.5, SD = 1.7 [35]). The comparatively higher frequency seen in the current study lends support for the use of mobile phone applications for EMA investigations of dietary temptations and lapses.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…Nevertheless, the average number of lapses recorded in the current study (M = 5.97, SD = .41) was considerably higher than that of other weight-related research (M = 2.7, SD = 1.9 [10], M = 1.5, SD = 1.7 [35]). The comparatively higher frequency seen in the current study lends support for the use of mobile phone applications for EMA investigations of dietary temptations and lapses.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…It has also been hypothesised that compensation when participants know that they are being given sugars differs from that when they are given sugars blind ( 4 , 5 ) . In the former conditions, psychological expectancy effects are more likely to occur, such as abstinence violation effects ( 6 , 7 ) , meaning that sugars can have both direct effects on energy intake and indirect effects by being the marker and sign of a less-healthy lifestyle that may include inactivity and surplus energy intake from all sources, notably from fat.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We suggest an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) study to track experiences over time and get insight into the process of behavior change, among which lapsing and relapsing (46). EMA has been proven useful in measuring lapses and relapses in previous studies (47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52), and therefore provides an opportunity to con rm the perceived predictors as identi ed in this study.…”
Section: Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 92%