2016
DOI: 10.1186/s13326-016-0101-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can SNOMED CT be squeezed without losing its shape?

Abstract: BackgroundIn biomedical applications where the size and complexity of SNOMED CT become problematic, using a smaller subset that can act as a reasonable substitute is usually preferred. In a special class of use cases—like ontology-based quality assurance, or when performing scaling experiments for real-time performance—it is essential that modules show a similar shape than SNOMED CT in terms of concept distribution per sub-hierarchy. Exactly how to extract such balanced modules remains unclear, as most previou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps a more pertinent question for the future development of SNOMED CT concerns balancing its objective to be a comprehensive terminology of clinical language (capable of facilitating interoperability and modelling deep phenotypes within disparate healthcare organisations across the globe) and the overwhelming complexity it would need to encompass in order to not constrain its users. Certainly, at more than 300 000 entities in its current incarnation, its size already presents problems in biomedical applications 39 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps a more pertinent question for the future development of SNOMED CT concerns balancing its objective to be a comprehensive terminology of clinical language (capable of facilitating interoperability and modelling deep phenotypes within disparate healthcare organisations across the globe) and the overwhelming complexity it would need to encompass in order to not constrain its users. Certainly, at more than 300 000 entities in its current incarnation, its size already presents problems in biomedical applications 39 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By providing a more complex and detailed coding structure, an unintended consequence may be that the data entry application is so complicated that clinicians disengage, resulting in a paradoxical decrease in acquired data [ 36 , 37 ]. The SNOMED-CT database is complex and needs to be presented in a way that makes sense to clinicians [ 38 , 39 ]. The interface must be intuitive and not overwhelming, and the search engine must return specific terms in a helpful order [ 40 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…formal or semiformal systems of categories, relationships, and axioms. Héja et al [ 32 ] and Lopez-Garcia and Schulz [ 33 ] asserted that the SCT ontology (SCTO) is error prone without alignment with highly constrained and formal upper-level ontologies, such as BFO, Descriptive Ontology for Linguistic and Cognitive Engineering (DOLCE), or BioTopLite [ 1 , 31 , 34 ]. Rodrigues et al [ 35 ] asserted that to build a common ontology, you have to agree on a common model of meaning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%