Can Smartphone Apps Increase Physical Activity? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Background Smartphone apps are a promising tool for delivering accessible and appealing physical activity interventions. Given the large growth of research in this field, there are now enough studies using the “gold standard” of experimental design—the randomized controlled trial design—and employing objective measurements of physical activity, to support a meta-analysis of these scientifically rigorous studies. Objective This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effectiveness of smartphone apps for increasing objectively measured physical activity in adults. Methods A total of 7 electronic databases (EMBASE, EmCare, MEDLINE, Scopus, Sport Discus, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) were searched from 2007 to January 2018. Following the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome and Study Design format, studies were eligible if they were randomized controlled trials involving adults, used a smartphone app as the primary or sole component of the physical activity intervention, used a no- or minimal-intervention control condition, and measured objective physical activity either in the form of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity minutes or steps. Study quality was assessed using a 25-item tool based on the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials checklist. A meta-analysis of study effects was conducted using a random effects model approach. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine whether intervention effectiveness differed on the basis of intervention length, target behavior (physical activity alone vs physical activity in combination with other health behaviors), or target population (general adult population vs specific health populations). Results Following removal of duplicates, a total of 6170 studies were identified from the original database searches. Of these, 9 studies, involving a total of 1740 participants, met eligibility criteria. Of these, 6 studies could be included in a meta-analysis of the effects of physical activity apps on steps per day. In comparison with the control conditions, smartphone apps produced a nonsignificant ( P =.19) increase in participants’ average steps per day, with a mean difference of 476.75 steps per day (95% CI −229.57 to 1183.07) between groups. Sensitivity analyses suggested that physical activity programs with a duration of less than 3 months were more effective than apps evaluated across more than 3 months ( P =.01), and that physical activity apps that targeted physical activity in isolation were more effective than apps that targeted physical activity in combination with diet ( P =.04). Physical activity app effectiveness did not appear to differ on the basis of target population. Conclusions This meta-analysis provides modest evidence supporting the effectiveness of smartphone apps to increase physical activity. To...

Adding Team-Based Financial Incentives to the Carrot Rewards App Increases Daily Step Count on a Population Scale: A 24-Week Matched Pairs Study

“…This aligns with a growing but still limited (to a small number of RCTs) evidence base suggesting that app exposure is paramount and that greater engagement may produce greater effects. [10][11][12]32 Limitations This study was not without limitations. The quasi-experimental design, for instance, makes it di cult to conclude with con dence that the Carrot Rewards STC feature caused an increase in PA. To increase internal validity in this real-world public health intervention context, we matched experimental participants with similar controls, used three main analytic approaches to address our primary objective and conducted two sensitivity analyses.…”

“…31 Among these ve, little consideration was given to the role of engagement as an effect moderator despite suggestions that intervention exposure is imperative and that greater engagement usually yields larger effects. 32 The Carrot Rewards app was a top tier Canadian app (i.e. 1.3 + million downloads, 500,000 + monthly active users (MAUs) as of May 2019) that rewarded users with loyalty points redeemable for consumer goods (e.g., gas, movies) for walking more.…”

Evaluation of mobile applications for fitness training and physical activity in healthy low-trained people - A modular interdisciplinary framework

“…The only RCT has already been covered by the review of Mateo et al (2015). Romeo et al (2019) performed a meta-analysis regarding the impact of smartphone apps on PA (steps per day). Literature search as well as quality of the studies and app features were carefully documented.…”

“…Considering the claims of the publishers, mobile fitness apps promise to boost fitness or health training. However, these "aggressive and exaggerated claims" (Düking et al, 2018, p.1) have rarely been sufficiently validated (e.g., Halson et al, 2016;Peake, Kerr, & Sullivan, 2018;Romeo et al, 2019). In current reviews, two aspects are criticized, i.e., lack of user or consumer integration in the development process and lack of adequate validating research (e.g., Düking et al, 2018;Peake, Kerr, & Sullivan, 2018, Warraich, 2016.…”

Think-aloud usability testing of an app to increase physical activity

“…Apps have the potential to contribute to health care [6] while remaining relatively inexpensive [7]. Recent results suggest that physical activity can be effectively increased by smartphone-based interventions [8][9][10][11].…”