2018
DOI: 10.5433/1679-0359.2018v39n5p2133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can ruminal inoculum from slaughtered cattle replace inoculum from cannulated cattle for feed evaluation research?

Abstract: The objective was to test the hypothesis that ruminal inoculum obtained from slaughtered cattle can replace inoculum from cannulated cattle in trials evaluating animal feedstuffs through in vitro gas production and digestibility. Five adult Holstein × Zebu steers with ruminal cannula were used to collect and compare rumen liquid from in vivo and slaughtered animals. In vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD), in vitro neutral detergent fiber digestibility (IVNDFD) and ammoniacal nitrogen concentrations did not … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To avoid sources of variation that affect the ruminal inoculum, sampling should be similar in time and collection method as described by Fortina et al [21]. Using univariate analysis methods, Alba et al [20] concluded that the rumen inoculum of cattle in slaughterhouses with unknown data, such as feeding, management, sex, breed, and others, can be used as a potential substitute for rumen inoculum obtained from cannulated cattle. However, the authors found some differences, as did other authors who used other sources of ruminal inoculum [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To avoid sources of variation that affect the ruminal inoculum, sampling should be similar in time and collection method as described by Fortina et al [21]. Using univariate analysis methods, Alba et al [20] concluded that the rumen inoculum of cattle in slaughterhouses with unknown data, such as feeding, management, sex, breed, and others, can be used as a potential substitute for rumen inoculum obtained from cannulated cattle. However, the authors found some differences, as did other authors who used other sources of ruminal inoculum [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twenty-six TNT bags (24 with a sample and 2 blank) were placed into jars (totaling 8 jars, previously heated to 40 • C, with the continuous addition of CO 2 ), totaling 104 bags/machine. Immediately, 1600 mL of buffer solution and 400 mL of ruminal inoculum were added [20]. The incubation process was carried out at 39 • C for 48 h. Subsequently, 40 mL of HCl (6N) and 8 g of pepsin (Sigma 1:10,000; dissolved in 34 mL of distilled H 2 O) were added and incubated for an additional 24 h. Afterwards, the bags were washed with tap water until the water ran clean, pre-dried in forced-air ovens (55 • C for 12 h), dried at 105 • C for 16 h, and weighed.…”
Section: Experimental Design Diets and In Vitro Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In conclusion, the ruminal inoculum obtained from slaughtered cattle is a viable alternative to using fistulated animals for digestibility analysis. This approach is ethically more humane as it eliminates the need for invasive procedures, thus reducing animal suffering [26] .…”
Section: Substituting Slaughtered Cattle Ruminal Inoculum For Cannula...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more ethically acceptable approach that reduces stress and alleviates the suffering of animals by avoiding an invasive procedure is the collection of RF at slaughtering. The RF collected at slaughter in controlled conditions has a limited difference from that sampled by other methods [ 7 , 8 , 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%